Disposed¶33

Smt. Pushpa v. Sri. v Manjunath

Karnataka HC5 Jun 2026WP/3778/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 227 writ petition converted to Civil Revision Petition; challenge to trial court order on I.A No.2 under Order 7 Rule 11(d) r/w Section 151 CPC in O.S. No.9887/2015 (XXV Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore); suit for bare injunction; LR application rejected by trial court; Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; decided 05-06-2026 by Vijaykumar A. Patil, J.; no precedent engaged; no monetary reliefs.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of for statistical purposes; Registry directed to convert it into a Civil Revision Petition, verify any delay, and require a delay application if needed. ¶33

Smt. Pushpa Vs Sri. v. Manjunath — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:26747 W.P. No.3778/2021

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.3778/2021 (GM-CPC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SMT. PUSHPA W/O LATE NAGAPPA @ NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS.

¶9

SRI. MANJUNATHA S/O LATE NAGAPPA @ NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.

¶10

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT MANJUNATHA NILAYA VENKATESHAPPA LAYOUT BABUSA PALYA KALYANA NAGAR POST BENGALURU-560043.

¶11

Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

(BY SMT. SHARVANI P.T. ADV., FOR SRI. RAHUL S. REDDY, ADV.,)

¶13

AND:

¶14

…PETITIONERS

¶15

SRI. V. MANJUNATH S/O VENKATARAMANAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/A NO.942/947, K.G. HALLI OPP. TO POLICE QUARTERS SRI BALAJI MEDICAL AND GENERAL STORES NAGAWARA MAIN ROAD, A.C. POST BENGALURU-560045.

¶16

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:26747 W.P. No.3778/2021

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

NAGAPPA @ NAGARAJ DEAD, AS THE SUIT IS FOR BARE INJUNCTION THE LR APPLICATION FILED BY THE RESPONDENT CAME TO BE REJECTED BY THE TRAIL COURT.

¶19

…RESPONDENT

¶20

(RESPONDENT - V MANJUNATH - SD)

¶21

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN O.S NO.9887/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE XXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE. QUASH THE ORDER DATED 11/12/2020 PASSED ON I.A NO.2 IN O.S. NO.9887/2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(d) R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC VIDE ANNEXURE E ON THE FILE OF THE XXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE BANGALORE AND ALLOW THE SAME & ETC.

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks conversion

¶26

of this writ petition to a Civil Revision petition, as the petitioner is challenging the order of the trial Court passed on IA.No.2 filed under Order 7 Rule 11(d) read with

¶27

¶28

NC: 2026:KHC:26747 W.P. No.3778/2021

¶29

HC-KAR

¶30

Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short ‘CPC’).

¶31

In view of the aforesaid prayer, this writ

¶32

petition is disposed of for statistical purposes.

¶33

The Registry shall convert this writ petition into a Civil Revision petition and shall verify whether there is any delay. If any delay is found, learned counsel for the petitioner shall file the necessary application.

¶34

Sd/(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE

¶35

ABK

¶36

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25

Smt. Pushpa v. Sri. v Manjunath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Pushpa v. Sri. v Manjunath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C T Rangaswamaiah Vs C S Ramesh

Smt Jayamma Vs Sri P Srirammayya

Sri. Bettaswamygowda Vs Smt Narasamma

Mahesha Vs Smt. Honnamma

M/S Sri Sai Developers Vs Chief Secretary

Sri Hulugappa Vs Malleshappa