Sri Hulugappa v. Malleshappa
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru; single Judge (Vijaykumar A. Patil); W.P. No.16995/2021 (GM-CPC) under Article 227 Constitution of India; dismissal for non-prosecution/default of appearance, notice not ordered; courts at Shikaripura; O.S.No.194/2020; M.A.No.03/2021; I.A.No.1 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 Code of Civil Procedure; petitioner Hulugappa s/o Bharmappa; respondents Malleshappa, Hanumanthappa @ Daneshappa and Basappa s/o Bharmappa.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution: there was no representation for the petitioner in either session, counsel had sought adjournment on all earlier dates, notice had not been ordered in the petition filed in 2021, and the petitioner appeared not interested in prosecuting the petition. ¶31