Hemanth Kumar v. the Authorised Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka HC, WP No. 34740 of 2025 (GM-DRT), NC: 2026:KHC:15463, decided 16-03-2026, bench: Smt. Justice Lalitha Kanneganti (single judge). Petitioner Hemanth Kumar (adv. Nazeefa M. Mulla) vs Authorised Officers, SMFG Grihashakti (respondents 1 and 2, adv. Suresh V.). Prayer: quash possession notices dated 04.11.2025 and 06.11.2025 issued by respondent no.2 for outstanding loan of Rs.59,47,065/-; writ petition under Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India. Counsel's memo recorded that the Bank had already taken possession; petition DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS; all I.As. closed. Keywords: SMFG Grihashakti, authorised officer, possession notice, infructuous dismissal, Articles 226/227.
What did the court decide?
Taking on record the petitioner's counsel's memo that the respondent/Bank had already taken possession, the court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.