Dismissed

Sri. Vinay Babu. M. P. v. Smt. M. K. Shwetha

Karnataka HC22 Jun 2026WP/34569/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India after the parties amicably settled their marital disputes and resumed living together. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition was accorded; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Sri. Vinay Babu. M. P. Vs Smt. M. K. Shwetha — Matrimonial and Divorce | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:30838 WP No. 34569 of 2024

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 22^ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO.34569 OF 2024 (GM-FC)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. VINAY BABU. M. P. S/O. MALLANNA S., AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, VIGILEANCE OFFICER, BE LTD., (REGD) CORPORATE OFFICE, OUTER RING ROAD, NAGAVARA, BENGALURU-560 045.

¶10

ALTERNATE ADDRESS:SRI. VINAY BABU. M. P., S/O. MALLANNA. S, Digitally signed R/AT NO. 974, 1ST FLOOR, by AASEEFA 1ST CROSS, 2ND BLOCK, PARVEEN BEHIND CANARA BANK, Location: HIGH COURT OF BEL LAYOUT, VIDYARANAYAPURAM, KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560 097.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. VASANTHAPPA,ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

SMT. M. K. SHWETHA, W/O. VINAY BABU. M. P., AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,

¶15

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:30838 WP No. 34569 of 2024

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

R/AT NO. 80, 1ST FLOOR, OPP. TO BODHI SATHVA COLLEGE, NEAR DAISY CONVENT, ARAVINDANAGAR, MYSURU-570 023.

¶18

…RESPONDENT

¶19

(BY SRI. GAURAV SUBRAMANYAM, ADVOCATE)

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF PAYMENT OF MONEY AS CLAIMED IN C.MIS NO. 831/2024 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT VIDE ANN-D1 DATED 11/11/2024 ON THE FILE OF 3RD ADDL. PRINCIPAL FAMILY COURT AT MYSURU.

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B-GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner Sri.Vasanthappa,

¶25

learned counsel for respondent Sri.Gaurav Subramanyam are present. Likewise, the parties to the proceedings Sri.Vinay Babu M.P., the petitioner and Smt.M.K.Shwetha, the respondent are present.

¶26

Both the learned counsel submits that the matters

¶27

pending between the parties are amicably settled and the

¶28

NC: 2026:KHC:30838 WP No. 34569 of 2024

¶29

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

parties to the proceedings are residing together. They want to put an end to all the litigations and lead happy marital life. A memo to that effect is also filed.

¶32

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

¶33

to withdraw the petition. Permission as prayed for is accorded.

¶34

Writ petition is thereby dismissed as withdrawn.

¶35

Sd/(DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA)

¶36

JUDGE

¶37

AP CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47

Sri. Vinay Babu. M. P. v. Smt. M. K. Shwetha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Vinay Babu. M. P. v. Smt. M. K. Shwetha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahadevanaika Vs Arogyaswamy

Sri. Ramegowda Vs Sri. Prakash

Sri. Muniraju Vs Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Sri Sai Krishna Vs Smt. H Tejaswini

Smt Kavitha Punjabi Vs Sri Sunil R Punjabi

Sri Pravin Naidu Vs Smt S Pooja Sree