Sri Pravin Naidu v. Smt S Pooja Sree
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: maintenance; Order 125 Cr.P.C; Sec.19(4) Family Courts Act; office objections; maintainability of revision petition; no representation; dismissal for non-pursuance; Family Court Bengaluru; Pravin Naidu v. S. Pooja Sree and Baby Hemanika Naidu. Revision petition (RPFC No. 91 of 2026) against a partly allowed maintenance interlocutory order dismissed because the petitioner failed to comply with office objections and abandoned the matter; the underlying Family Court order is left undisturbed.
What did the court decide?
Since the petitioner neither complied with the office objections nor made any submission regarding the maintainability of the revision petition, it is clear that he is not interested in pursuing the matter; therefore the revision petition stands dismissed. ¶31