Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 33249 of 2025 (GM-CPC); decided 06.03.2026 by K. V. Aravind, J.; Marigowda & Anr. v. Chikkegowda @ Gujjegowda; writ under Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; challenge to order dated 14.10.2025 of Senior Civil Judge, Maddur in R.A.No.29/2025 rejecting I.A. No.1 under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC for stay of judgment and decree dated 11.07.2025 in O.S. No.601/2015; executability of decree of injunction under Order XXI Rule 32 CPC; appeal at final hearing stage; time-bound disposal of appeal within three months; parties not to precipitate; writ petition disposed of; no costs or quantum awarded.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of; Senior Civil Judge, Maddur directed/requested to dispose of R.A. No.29/2025 within an outer limit of three months; either counsel to place a copy of the order before the Appellate Court to ensure compliance; submission of counsel for both parties that neither party shall precipitate the issue placed on record. The impugned order was not set aside and the stay application was not remitted for fresh consideration.