Disposed¶35

Smt S N Rathnamma v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC2 Jun 2026WP/32184/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Khata recording; RTC; mutation; representation dated 23.09.2025 (Annexure-D); registered compromise decree dated 09.04.2019; final decree in O.S.No.6636/2018; XX Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City; Tahsildar Bengaluru East Taluk; State of Karnataka Revenue Department; Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; time-bound direction (one month); writ disposed; NC: 2026:KHC:25571; WP No. 32184 of 2025 (KLR-RES); HC-KAR.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 23.09.2025 (Annexure-D) in accordance with law and take decision in terms of the Decree in O.S.No.6636/2018 within one month from receipt of certified copy of the order. ¶35

Smt S N Rathnamma Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:25571 WP No. 32184 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.32184 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SMT. S.N. RATHNAMMA W/O LATE H.P. KRISHNA REDDY AGE ABOUT 74 YEARS R/A NO.43 NEW MUNICIPAL NO.262/43, 5^TH MAIN ROAD 4^TH BLOCK JAYANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 011.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. BALARAJ V.R., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶15

THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU BENGALURU DISTRICT - 560 036.

¶16

…RESPONDENTS

¶17

(BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP )

¶18

¶19

NC: 2026:KHC:25571 WP No. 32184 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE 2^ND RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 23.09.2025 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D AND CONSEQUENTLY RECORD THE KHATA AND ISSUE RTC AND MUTATION IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER AS PER THE REGISTERED COMPROMISE DECREE DATED 09.04.2019 IN RESPECT OF THE LANDS IN QUESTION.

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

¶23

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

Heard Sri. Balaraj V.R., learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondents.

¶27

In this Writ Petition, petitioner has sought for a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 23.09.2025 (Annexure-D) and to effect khata in the RTC and mutation records in terms of the registered compromise decree dated 09.04.2019 produced at Annexure-C to the Writ Petition.

¶28

Sri. Balaraj V.R., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner referred to the final decree in O.S.No.6636/2018 on

¶29

¶30

NC: 2026:KHC:25571 WP No. 32184 of 2025

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

the file of the XX Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge at Bengaluru City(Annexure-C) and contended that, the respondent No.2 be directed to effect khata in terms of the compromise final Decree in O.S.No.6636/2018.

¶33

Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader submitted that khata be mutated in terms of the Judgment and Decree in O.S. No.6636/2018.

¶34

Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representation dated 23.09.2025(Annexure-D) in accordance with law, and take decision in terms of the Decree in O.S.No.6636/2018 referred to at Annexure-C to the Writ Petition, within one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶35

The Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶36

SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶37

sac

¶38

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25

Smt S N Rathnamma v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt S N Rathnamma v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hazrath Jung-E-Bahadur Sjhah Khadari Vs Deputy Commissioner (Revenue)

Sri. Somaradhya Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Smt.Bhagyamma Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Gangadhar Vs State of Karnataka

Gaddegowda B G Vs State of Karnataka

M/S Birgade Resorts and Hotels Vs Sri Harish Kumar Oberoi