Smt.Bhagyamma v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka HC (Bengaluru), WP 20886/2025 (KLR-RR/SUR), disposed of 01.06.2026, Justice E.S. Indiresh. Widow petitioner (Smt. Bhagyamma) obtained a non-merits direction: Tahsildar, Bengaluru South Taluk to consider her five representations (Annexures K, L, M, N, P; dated 19.03.2021 to 05.07.2025) for continuing deceased husband Bomme Gowda's name in the RTC of Survey No.3, Seegehalli Village, Kengeri, in accordance with law within four months. Filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India; counsel: Guthal Sivappa Shankarappa (petitioner), Spoorthy Hegde N., HCGP (respondents). Search terms: RTC mutation / continuation of deceased owner's name, revenue records direction to consider representation, Seegehalli village Kengeri Bengaluru South Taluk, Tahsildar order, four-month compliance timeline, Articles 226/227 writ disposal.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the respondent No.2-Tahsildar to consider the petitioner's representations dated 19.03.2021, 24.01.2022, 04.05.2023, 06.02.2024 and 05.07.2025 (Annexures 'K', 'L', 'M', 'N' and 'P') in accordance with law, within an outer limit of four months from the date of receipt of the order; writ petition disposed of without expressing any opinion on merits.