Rajanna v. Lingammani
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged a trial court order on an amendment application in a partition suit. With no representation for the petitioner on two consecutive occasions, the High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
- 1 -
NC: 2026:KHC:27182 W.P. No.319/2022
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.319/2022 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
RAJANNA S/O LATE CHIKKAMADAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT. HALLIKEREHUNDI VILLAGE CHATRA HOBLI NANJANGUD TALUK.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MOHAN K, ADV., [ABSENT])
AND:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAJANNA S/O LATE CHIKKAMADAPPA
- respondent
LINGAMMANI W/O MAHADEVAPPA D/O CHIKKAMADAPPA
- respondent
MANJULA D/O LATE CHIKKAMADAPPA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/319/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court