Smt Bettamma v. Sri Puttamadegowda
Case brief
What is this about?
W.P. No.4178/2022 (GM-CPC), High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, decided 08-06-2026 by Justice Vijaykumar A. Patil; writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashal of Execution No.4/2020 pending before the Civil Judge and JMFC, T. Narasipura (also rendered 'T.Narsipura'), Mysore, filed by respondent decree holders (legal heirs of late Puttamadegowda); possession of property delivered in terms of the decree; writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no relief granted; petitioners' counsel Satish K; respondents' counsel Baiju Stephen for R.A. Devanand; no precedents cited; no monetary amounts.
What did the court decide?
Acting on learned counsel for the respondents/decree holders' submission that possession of the property had been delivered in terms of the decree, the Court dismissed the writ petition as having become infructuous.