Dismissed¶32

Sri.R. Narasimhaiah v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC8 Jan 2026WP/26502/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WP No. 26502 of 2025 (KLR-RES); HC-KAR; NC: 2026:KHC:1129; decided 08-01-2026 by R Devdas J.; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved to challenge Tahsildar Ramanagara Taluk's endorsement dated 27.10.2025 rejecting Form No.53 application (lands within 18 kms prohibited distance of BBMP boundary); saguvali chit representation dated 11.08.2025; Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India; no precedent engaged.

What did the court decide?

Liberty reserved to the petitioner to raise a challenge to the endorsement dated 27.10.2025 issued by the respondent - Tahsildar; no substantive relief granted as the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. ¶32

Sri.R. Narasimhaiah Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:1129 WP No. 26502 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 26502 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI.R. NARASIMHAIAH S/O RANGASWAMIAH, AGE 65 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O PERSONALAPALYA, SHANUMANGALA, RAMANGARA TALUK AND DIST.562019.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. GEETHA A.,ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, BENGALURU- 560001.

¶15

THE TAHSILDAR RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA- 562159.

¶16

…RESPONDENTS

¶17

(BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R3; SRI. VIDYA NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR R4.,)

¶18

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:1129 WP No. 26502 of 2025

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT BEARING NO. LND/CR/965/1999-2000 DTD 12.08.2025 VIDE ANNX-G ISSUED BY THE R-2 TO THE WP AND CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DTD 11.08.2025 VIDE ANNX-F SAGUVALI CHIT MAY BE ISSUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶25

although a memo for withdrawal was filed on 10.11.2025, nevertheless the respondent – Tahsildar, Ramanagara Taluk has issued an endorsement dated 27.10.2025, rejecting the application filed by the petitioner in Form No.53 on the ground that the lands in question are within the prohibited distance of 18 kms., from the boundary of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike and therefore the application cannot be entertained.

¶26

¶27

NC: 2026:KHC:1129 WP No. 26502 of 2025

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

The learned counsel for the petitioner therefore

¶30

submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw

¶31

the writ petition, while also seeking leave to raise a challenge to the endorsement issued by the respondent - Tahsildar.

¶32

Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, while reserving liberty to the petitioner to raise a challenge to the endorsement dated 27.10.2025, issued by the respondent - Tahsildar.

¶33

Sd/(R DEVDAS) JUDGE

¶34

JJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17

Sri.R. Narasimhaiah v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri.R. Narasimhaiah v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Rangadamaiah @ Rangadamappa Vs Sri Abbanna

Ramesh S Vs the Tahsildar

Mr John Bosco Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. Palaxayya Shivamurthayya Hiremath Vs Sri. Shivabasappa Neelappa Navalgund

Sri Renukappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Timmahanumakka Vs the State of Karnataka