Dismissed¶37

Sri E Naresh v. Bangalore Development Authority

Karnataka HC19 Jun 2026WP/25911/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: Karnataka High Court; Writ Petition 25911 of 2025; BDA; Bangalore Development Authority; e-auction sale; sale deed dated 23.05.2024 (Annexure-B); refund of sale consideration Rs. 89,87,501; interest 24% p.a.; Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; withdrawal memo; dismissed as not pressed; Justice K.S. Hemalekha; order dated 19.06.2026. Use-case flag: purely administrative disposal by withdrawal - carries no adjudicated ratio and should not be cited for the validity of BDA e-auction sales or refund claims.

What did the court decide?

In view of the memo filed by learned counsel for the petitioners seeking withdrawal, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. ¶37

Sri E Naresh Vs Bangalore Development Authority — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:30396 WP No. 25911 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 19^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO.25911 OF 2025 (BDA)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI E. NARESH S/O JAYARAM REDDY, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,

¶11

SRI E. GIRISH S/O JAYARAM REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,

¶12

BOTH ARE PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT 4-14, ASLAPURAM, NELLEPALLI, CHITTOR, ANDHRA PRADESH, PINCODE – 517167.

¶13

Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

CURRENTLY RESIDING AT SPARROW NEXT, 204, ANUGRAHA LAYOUT, B. NARAYANAPURA, BENGALURU-560016.

¶15

…PETITIONERS

¶16

(BY SRI BHARATH K., ADVOCATE)

¶17

AND:

¶18

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HAVING OFFICE AT T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, BANGALORE – 560020 REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE-560027.

¶19

…RESPONDENT

¶20

(BY SRI KARTHIKEYAN B.S., ADVOCATE)

¶21

¶22

NC: 2026:KHC:30396 WP No. 25911 of 2025

¶23

HC-KAR

¶24

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO CANCEL THE E-AUCTION SALE TRANSACTION WHICH CULMINATED IN THE EXECUTION OF THE SALE DEED DATED 23.05.2024 (ANNEXURE-B), AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.1 TO REFUND THE SALE CONSIDERATION AMOUNT OF RS.89,87,501/ALONG WITH REGISTRATION CHARGES, STAMP DUTY, AND INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 24% PER ANNUM AND ETC.

¶25

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

¶27

ORAL ORDER

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition, which reads as under:

¶29

“The counsel for petitioners most respectfully submits as follows:

¶30

That, the petitioners are intending to withdraw the petition as not pressed.

¶31

Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the petition as not pressed in the interest of justice.”

¶32

2. Memo is placed on record.

¶33

¶34

NC: 2026:KHC:30396 WP No. 25911 of 2025

¶35

HC-KAR

¶36