Complainant filed a Civil Contempt Petition alleging disobedience of a previous High Court order. Counsel submitted the complaint was closed as the alleged order had been complied with. Court accepted the submission and closed the complaint.
Complaint closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2026:KHC:30217-DB CCC No. 1567 of 2025
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1567 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI LETHIF B., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by VEERENDRA KUMAR K M Location: High Court of Karnataka
AND:
NC: 2026:KHC:30217-DB CCC No. 1567 of 2025
HC-KAR
VIKASA SOUDHA
BENGALURU - 560 001
…ACCUSED
…PRO FORMA RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. B. SUKANYA BALIGA, AGA)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND READ WITH SECTIONS 11 & 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, PRAYING TO TAKE COGNIZANCE OF CONTEMPT OF COURT COMMITTED BY THE ACCUSED FOR COMMITTING THE CONTEMPT OF COURT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT BY DISOBEYING THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.20545/2024 DATED 16.07.2025 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B, TO THIS CONTEMPT PETITION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
NC: 2026:KHC:30217-DB CCC No. 1567 of 2025
HC-KAR
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)
Sd/(VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/(K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE
KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7
2 provisions across 2 enactments
ANWAR SADATH S
SRI RITESH KUMAR SINGH
SMT. DEEPA CHOLAN
STATE OF KARNATAKA
VIBHU BAKHRU
K.S. HEMALEKHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
