Disposed¶30

Sri. Nataraja N., v. the Commissioner

Karnataka HC23 Mar 2026WP/25892/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC Bengaluru, WP 25892/2025 (S-RES), S.R. Krishna Kumar J., order dated 23.03.2026: writ petition under Articles 226/227 against BBMP Deputy Commissioner (Admin) order dt. 21.08.25 (B12(6)PR/E-159426/25-26, Annx-D) disposed of as withdrawn on petitioner's memo dt. 23.03.2026 citing earlier protection dt. 23.08.2025, formation of Greater Bengaluru authority and fresh appointment of petitioner (Assistant Executive Engineer); counsel: Punith C. for petitioner, B. L. Sanjeev for R1–R3; no findings on merits, no cases cited, no monetary award.

What did the court decide?

No relief adjudicated; writ petition disposed of as withdrawn on the petitioner's memo dated 23.03.2026, which was placed on record. ¶30

Sri. Nataraja N., Vs the Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:16326 WP No. 25892 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 23^RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 25892 OF 2025 (S-RES)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI. NATARAJA N., SON OF NARASIMHAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDING AT # 58, 1^ST B CROSS 5^TH BLOCK, BSK 3^RD STAGE, BENGALURU – 560 085

¶11

PRESNTLY WORKING AS ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER EARLIER GIRINAGARA NOW CALLED AS VIDYAPEETA SUB DIVISION, BANGALORE – 560 085

¶12

…PETITIONER

¶13

(BY SRI. PUNITH C., ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶16

THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALUR MAHANAGARA PALIKE N. R. SQUARE, BANGALORE PINCODE – 560 001

¶17

THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER (ADMIN) BRUHAT BENGALUR MAHANAGARA PALIKE N. R. SQUARE, BANGALORE PINCODE – 560 001

¶18

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ADMIN) BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N. R. SQUARE, BANGALORE PINCODE – 560 001

¶19

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3)

¶20

¶21

NC: 2026:KHC:16326 WP No. 25892 of 2025

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 21.08.25 VIDE B12(6)PR/E-159426/25-26 AS PER ANNXD PASSED BY THE RESPONDENTS NO.3 AND ETC.,

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 23.03.2026, which reads as under:

¶27

“That the petitioner was protected by this Hon’ble Court on 23.08.2025 and in view of the subsequent events and formation of Greater Bengaluru authority, a fresh appointment has been given to the petitioner and he is discharging his duties in the subsequent post. Hence, this writ petition does not survive for consideration.”

¶28

The aforesaid memo is placed on record.

¶29

In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition is

¶30

disposed of as withdrawn.

¶31

Sd/(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE

¶32

BMC

¶33

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 79

Sri. Nataraja N., v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. Nataraja N., v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr B Nagaraja Goud Vs State of Karnataka

Dr. Shekar H S Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri B Gopal Krishna Vs the State of Karnataka

Shri Mohamed Safeer S Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Erabhadra K M Vs the State of Karnataka

Anil K M Vs Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited