Dismissed¶34

Sri Balu Vikram R v. Union Bank of India

Karnataka HC13 Jan 2026WP/25275/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 25275 of 2024 (GM-DRT); decided 13.01.2026 by Ashok S. Kinagi, J.; petitioners Balu Vikram R and Yamuna S. Kumar R; respondent Union Bank of India (erstwhile Andhra Bank), Annapoorneswari Nagar Branch; challenge under Articles 226 and 227 to order dated 12.07.2023 of XLI Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru in C.Misc. No. 7455/2022; Bank completed public e-auction and sale certificate issued to auction purchaser; writ petition dismissed as infructuous; pending IAs disposed.

What did the court decide?

In view of the respondent Bank having conducted the public e-auction pursuant to the e-auction notification and produced the sale certificate issued in favour of the auction purchaser, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. ¶30

Sri Balu Vikram R Vs Union Bank of India — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:2204 WP No. 25275 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 13^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 25275 OF 2024 (GM-DRT)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI BALU VIKRAM R

¶11

S/O. SRI. K.RAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, PRESENTLY R/AT. C/O. RAMAPPA, HONNAPPA LAYOUT, KENGUNTE CIRCLE, NAGARABAVI, BANGALORE SOUTH , BANGALORE-560 056.

¶12

Digitally signed by KIRAN 2. SMT. YAMUNA S. KUMAR R W/O. BALU VIKRAM R. Location: HIGH COURT OF AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, KARNATAKA PRESENTLY R/AT. C/O. RAMAPPA, HONNAPPA LAYOUT, KENGUNTE CIRCLE, NAGARABAVI, BANGALORE SOUTH, BANGALORE-560 056.

¶13

&PETITIONERS

¶14

(BY SRI. NANJAPPA B N., ADVOCATE)

¶15

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:2204 WP No. 25275 of 2024

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

AND:

¶18

UNION BANK OF INDIA (ERSTWHILE ANDHRA BANK). ANNAPOORNESWARI NAGAR BRANCH, NO.2, 'SRI KAMALA', 60 FT. ROAD, 15^TH CROSS, 2^ND MAIN, HEALTH LAYOUT, ANNAPOORNESWARI NAGAR, NAGARABHAVI 2^ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560 091. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER/ AUTHORISED OFFICER, RAJAJI NAGAR BRANCH, BANGALORE (ON BEHALF OF ANNAPOORNESWARI NAGAR BRANCH). SRI. HARE RAM, S/O. RAMANATH SINGH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.

¶19

&RESPONDENT (BY SMT. LAKSHMI K., VARADARAJ, ADVOCATES)

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 12.07.23 PASSED BY THE HON9BLE LOWER COURT IN C.MISC. NO 7455/22 AGAINST THE PETITIONERS ON THE FILE OF XLI ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU ANNEXURES-A.

¶21

¶22

NC: 2026:KHC:2204 WP No. 25275 of 2024

¶23

HC-KAR

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 8B9 GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

The petitioners filed this writ petition challenging the impugned order dated 12.07.2023 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 7455 of 2022 by the Learned XLI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru vide Annexure-A.

¶28

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that, pursuant to the e-auction notification, the respondent Bank conducted public e-auction and produced the sale certificate issued in favour of the auction purchaser.

¶29