Sri Ramanji a Vs M/S Shriram Finance Limited — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2026)

Sri Ramanji a Vs M/S Shriram Finance Limited — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents within one week; respondents directed to consider it and pass an appropriate order within two weeks of receipt; respondents directed not to take any coercive steps till passing an order on the representation; pending applications, if any, disposed of accordingly.

Issue for consideration

Whether the possession notice dated 10.09.2025 issued by Respondent No. 2 (R-2) at Annexure-A was illegal and should be quashed / set aside

Ratio / Principle

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, following the petitioner's counsel seeking leave to withdraw with liberty to make a representation

Key takeaways

Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents within one week; the respondents are directed to consider the representation and pass an appropriate order within two weeks of its receiptratio¶37
Meanwhile, the respondents are directed not to take any coercive steps till passing an order on the representationratio¶42
Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordinglyratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Petition No. 36743 of 2025 (GM-DRT), High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok S.Kinagi, decided 13 January 2026. Petitioner Sri Ramanji A, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, prayed for quashing / setting aside a possession notice dated 10.09.2025 issued by Respondent No. 2 (M/s Shriram Finance Limited) at Annexure-A as illegal; respondents represented by Sri B C Avinash. Coming on for preliminary hearing, counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to make a representation; the memo was placed on record and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The Court reserved liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents within one week, directed the respondents to consider it and pass an appropriate order within two weeks of receipt, directed that no coercive steps be taken till such order, and disposed of pending applications, if any, accordingly. The legality of the possession notice was not adjudicated.

1 -

NC: 2026:KHC:1948 WP No. 36743 of 2025

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

WRIT PETITION NO. 36743 OF 2025 (GM-DRT)

BETWEEN:

SRI RAMANJI A

S/O. SRI. ANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/ AT ENN HAKKORE COMPLEX

HINDUPURA MAIN ROAD, OPP TO CHURCH, PRASHANTH NAGAR,

Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

PUTTAPURLAHALLI, KALLUDI, GOWRIBIDANUR TWON, GOWRIBIDNAUR TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 561208.

&PETITIONER

(BY SRI. KUMARA., ADV.)

AND:

M/S SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED REP. BY THE BRANCH MANAGER

2 -

NC: 2026:KHC:1948 WP No. 36743 of 2025

HC-KAR

BRANCH OFFICE AT D NO. 1-4-12, 1ST FLOOR, BESIDE BST FILLING STATION, HINDUPUR-515201(AP) REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2013

M/S. SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED

REGISTERED OFFICE AT SRI TOWERS, PLOT NO. 14A, SOUTH PHASE, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, GUINDY, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU-600032 REP. BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2013

&RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. B C AVINASH., ADV.)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH / SET ASIDE THE POSSESSION NOTICE DTD. 10.09.2025 ISSUED BY THE R-2 AT ANNX-A HOLDING THE SAME AS ILLEGAL AND ETC.,

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

3 -

NC: 2026:KHC:1948 WP No. 36743 of 2025

HC-KAR

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

ORAL ORDER

After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to make a representation.

2. The memo is placed on record.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as

withdrawn .

Liberty is resolved to the petitioner to make a

representation to the respondents within one week from today and thereafter, the respondents are directed to consider the representation and pass an appropriate order within two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation.

4 -

NC: 2026:KHC:1948 WP No. 36743 of 2025

HC-KAR

Meanwhile, the respondents are directed not to

take any coercive steps till passing an order on the representation.

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed off

accordingly.

Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE

SSB