Disposed¶42

Mohan Raju v. the Deputy Commissioner

Karnataka HC15 Jul 2026WP/25185/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mohan Raju and others v. Deputy Commissioner, Chikkamagaluru and others | WP No. 25185 of 2025 (KLR-RES) | High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru | Justice E.S. Indiresh (ORAL ORDER) | decided 15 July 2026 | NC: 2026:KHC:36073 | CNR: KAHC010547692025 | change of khatha | representation dated 15.05.2025 (Annexure-F) | letter dated 22.05.2025 (Annexure-G, RRT ITHARE 41 2025 (E-833397)) by Assistant Commissioner, Tarikere Sub Division | Tahsildar, Kadur Taluk directed to consider representation within two months | Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India | writ petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.3 (Tahsildar, Kadur Taluk) to consider the petitioners' representation dated 15.05.2025 (Annexure-F) within two months from receipt of certified copy of the order. ¶42

Mohan Raju Vs the Deputy Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

NC: 2026:KHC:36073 WP No. 25185 of 2025

¶4

CNR: KAHC010547692025

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶6

DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶7

BEFORE

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 25185 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

MOHAN RAJU S/O LATE MALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,

¶11

SMT CHOWDAMMA

¶12

W/O LATE MALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, OCCUPATION AGRICULTURIST AND HOUSE HOLD WORK,

¶13

3. RAMESH

¶14

Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

S/O LATE MALAPPA,

¶16

AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCCUPATION AGRICULTURIST,

¶17

4. CHOWDAPPA

¶18

S/O LATE MALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCCUPATION AGRICULTURIST, ALL ARE R/AT INGALARANAHALLI VILLAGE, BIRURU HOBLI, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577228

¶19

…PETITIONERS

¶20

(BY SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA HARAVI., ADVOCATE)

¶21

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

NC: 2026:KHC:36073 WP No. 25185 of 2025

¶24

CNR: KAHC010547692025

¶25

AND:

¶26

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT, CHIKKAMAGALURU-577228.

¶27

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TARIKERE SUB DIVISION, TARIKERE, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577228.

¶28

THE TAHSILDAR KADUR TALUK KADUR, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577228.

¶29

…RESPONDENTS

¶30

(BY SMT.B.P.RADHA., AGA)

¶31

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R-3 SHALL IMPLEMENT THE OFFICIAL LETTER DTD 22.05.2025 VIDE ANNX-G BEARING NO. RRT ITHARE 41 2025 (E-833397) WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD 15.05.2025 VIDE ANNX-F FOR THE CHANGE OF KHATHA AND ETC.,

¶32

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶33

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

NC: 2026:KHC:36073 WP No. 25185 of 2025

¶36

CNR: KAHC010547692025

¶37

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶38

ORAL ORDER

¶39

The petitioners in this writ petition, are seeking direction to the respondent No.3 to consider the representation dated 15.05.2025 (Annexure-F), interalia sought for direction to the respondent No.3 to implement the letter/order dated 22.05.2025 (Annexure-G), issued by the respondent No.2.

¶40

In that view of the matter, respondent No.3 is

¶41

directed to consider the representation at Annexure-F, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶42

With these observations, writ petition stands disposed of .

¶43

SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶44

KLY; List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21

Mohan Raju v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohan Raju v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muni Akkayamma Vs State of Karnataka

Smt Vimala S Vs Deputy Commissioner

Sri Ramesh Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Sri Muniyallappa Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Smt.Nagamma Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Smt. B.V. Leelavathi Vs the Deputy Commissioner