Sri B Keshava Kumar v. Mr. Sajid Samran
Writ Petition (Article 227, GM-CPC) – Temporary injunction – Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 24121 of 2022 (GM-CPC); Justice Vijaykumar A. Patil; decided 16.06.2026; Article 227 writ petition; temporary injunction; Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC; O.S.No.179/2021; M.A.No.27/2021; I.A.No.1; Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM Mangaluru; 5th Additional Civil Judge and JMFC Mangaluru; encroachment; removal of soil; barbed fencing; petrol bunk construction; Schedule 'A' and Schedule 'B' properties; registered sale deed dated 28.03.2016; prima facie case; irreparable loss; balance of convenience; writ petition disposed of; no interference with appellate order; defendants free to use Schedule 'B'; petitioners B. Keshava Kumar and Sowmya Zavier; respondent Sajid Samran.
What did the court decide?
No relief to the petitioners; the writ petition was disposed of leaving the appellate Court's order granting temporary injunction in respect of Schedule 'A' property undisturbed, while observing that the defendants remain free to carry out activities in Schedule 'B' property.