Dismissed¶26

Sri Srinivas v. Sri M K Thimmegowda

Karnataka HC16 Jun 2026WP/23831/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; Vijaykumar A. Patil, J.; W.P. No.23831/2022 (GM-CPC); decided 16 June 2026; Article 227 petition by Srinivas vs M.K. Thimmegowda and B.T. Chandrashekar challenging orders of 23.05.2022 (IA No.I, O.S. No.79/2021, Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Arakalagudu) and 28.10.2022 (M.A No.28/2022, II Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Hassan); counsel H.R. Shridharamurthy for petitioner, Girish B. Baladare for respondents; petition dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's memo; no merits decided.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sri Srinivas Vs Sri M K Thimmegowda — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:29198 W.P. No.23831/2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.23831/2022 (GM-CPC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O M.K. THIMMEGOWDA R/O DADDAMAGGE VILLAGE AND HOBLI ARAKALGUD TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 573102.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. H.R. SHRIDHARAMURTHY, ADV.,)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

SRI. M.K. THIMMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS S/O M.G. KRISHNEGOWDA R/O DADDAMAGGE VILLAGE AND HOBLI, ARAKALGUD TALUK HASSAN DISTIRCT-573102.

¶14

SRI. B.T. CHANDRASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS S/O M.K. THIMMEGOWDA R/O DADDAMAGGE VILLAGE AND HOBLI, ARAKALAGUD TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 573102.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SRI. GIRISH B. BALADARE, ADV.,)

¶17

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN OS NO.79/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALAGUDU AND ALSO IN MA NO

¶18

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:29198 W.P. No.23831/2022

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

28/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT HASSAN, HEAR THE PARTIES AND PASS THE FOLLOWING ORDERS. QUASH / SET ASIDE THE ORDERS DATED 23.05.2022 PASSED ON IA NO. I OS NO. 79/2021 BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALAGUDU VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ALSO THE ORDERS DATED 28.10.2022 PASSED IN M.A NO.28/2022 BY THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT HASSAN VIDE ANNEXURE-B, AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE I.A. NO.1 FILED BY THE PETITIONER IN OS NO.79/2021 BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALAGUDU & ETC.

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶22

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition which reads as under:

¶24

“The undersigned counsel representing the petitioner herewith prays that, this Hon’ble court be pleased to dismiss the above writ petition as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶25

In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition is

¶26

dismissed as withdrawn.

¶27

Sd/(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE

¶28

ABK, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48

Sri Srinivas v. Sri M K Thimmegowda

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sri Srinivas v. Sri M K Thimmegowda

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J Prashanth Hegde Vs Dr H Nanjappa

Maxworth Realty India Limited Vs Smt. Nagalakshmanna Since Dead by Lrs

Smt v Bhagya Vs Smt v Dhanalakshmi

Ravi S/O Late Chaluvaiah Vs Chaluvamma

Sri B Keshava Kumar Vs Mr. Sajid Samran

Sri Honnegowda Vs Smt Nagamma