Sri v Ramprasad Vs State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

Sri v Ramprasad Vs State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

1 -

NC: 2026:KHC:26353 WP No. 20292 of 2017

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 4^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 20292 OF 2017 (KLR-RES)

BETWEEN:

SRI V RAMPRASAD S/O LATE VARADARAJU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O NO. 155/A 9TH MAIN, RMV EXTENSION SADASHIVANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 080.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI: VISHWANATH H M, ADVOCATE)

AND:

Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING DR B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU - 560 001.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION DODDABALLAPURA - 561 203.

THE TAHSILDAR DEVANAHALLI TALUK DEVANAHALLI BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:26353 WP No. 20292 of 2017

HC-KAR

SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O LATE VENKATSWAMY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT HEGGANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110.

MUNIRAJU S/O LATE VENKATSWAMY AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT HEGGANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110.

SUBBARAYAPPA S/O LATE VENKATSWAMY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT HEGGANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110.

RAVI S/O LATE VENKATSWAMY AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS R/AT HEGGANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110.

SMT. MUNIYAMMA W/O SUBBA D/O LATE PEDDANNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT HEGGANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110.

KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE PEDDANNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT HEGGANAHALLI VILLAGE

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:26353 WP No. 20292 of 2017

HC-KAR

KUNDANA HOBLI

DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110.

SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE MARAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT HEGGANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110.

MUNIYAPPA S/O LATE MARAPPA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS R/AT HEGGANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110.

SRINIVASA @ SRIDHAR S/O LATE MARAPPA AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS R/AT HEGGANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110.

MARAKKA

W/O LATE NARAYANA D/O LATE PEDDANNA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

R/AT HEGGANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI

DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110.

VENKATAMMA W/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT HEGGANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110.

4 - NC: 2026:KHC:26353 WP No. 20292 of 2017

HC-KAR

MASTER KARTHIK

S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS BEING MINOR REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN AND MOTHER VENKATAMMA R/AT HEGGANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110.

KUMARI LALITHA

D/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS BEING MINOR REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN AND MOTHER VENKATAMMA R/AT HEGGANAHALLI VILLAGE KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI:SPOORTHY HEGDE N, HCGP FOR R1 TO 3; R4 TO R8 - PETITION STANDS DISMISSED V/O/DTD 31.05.2019; R9 TO R16 - SERVED)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS WRIT PETITION; CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO R.A.(D.H.) NO.93/2016-17 ON THE FILE OF THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPUR; QUASH THE IMPUGNED DATED 12.04.2017 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 IN R.A.(DH).NO.93/2016-17 ON THE FILE OF THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPUR, AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,

THIS WP, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

5 -

NC: 2026:KHC:26353 WP No. 20292 of 2017

HC-KAR

ORAL ORDER

In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the interim order dated 12.04.2017 passed by respondent No.2 (AnnexureA).

Having taken note of the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, since the interim order is challenged before this Court, respondent No.2 is directed to conclude the entire proceedings in RA(DH) No.93/2016-17 at the earliest i.e., within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order, if the said proceedings is not concluded as on today.

With these observations, the writ petition is accordingly, disposed.

SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

BGN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60