Smt Munirathna v. the Deputy Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Search terms: khata; registered Sale Deed dated 05.06.1950; R.A.(S) No.148/2012-13; RP No.382/2015-16; Annexure-D; Annexure-F; Original Suit No.1224 of 2012; Deputy Commissioner Bengaluru Urban District; Assistant Commissioner Revenue Department; Tahsildar Bengaluru South Taluk; Gollahalli Village; Kumbalgodu Post; Kengeri Hobli; Bengaluru South Taluk; Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; writ petition disposed of; liberty reserved to pursue civil suit; respondent No.7 Lakshmamma; Justice E.S. Indiresh; HC-KAR; WP No.30661 of 2024 (KLR-RES); NC: 2026:KHC:26307; Kandaya Bhavan; petitioners Munirathna, Mallaiah, Bhagyamma, Ramesh, Neelamma, Gunavathi, Shashidhar; no perversity in impugned orders.
What did the court decide?
No substantive relief; the impugned orders (Annexures-D and F) were left undisturbed and the writ petition was disposed of, with liberty reserved to the petitioners to pursue Original Suit No.1224 of 2012 before the competent Civil Court.