Disposed¶51

Smt Nagalakshmi @ Lakshmi v. Sri K Nagendra Babu

Karnataka HC3 Jul 2026WP/20000/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 227 mandamus for time-bound disposal of interlocutory application; Section 151 CPC application IA No.2 in FDP 75/2024 (final decree proceedings); application filed 2024 not considered by trial court; XVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru; two-month deadline; Karnataka High Court civil writ (GM-CPC); Nagalakshmi @ Lakshmi v. Renuka and other legal heirs of K. Nagendra Babu; Annexure-E; disposal of writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Trial Court requested to dispose of I.A.No.2 (Section 151 CPC application in FDP 75/2024) within two months from receipt of copy of the order; writ petition disposed of; all I.As. in the petition closed. ¶51

Smt Nagalakshmi @ Lakshmi Vs Sri K Nagendra Babu — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:33505 WP No. 20000 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 3^RD DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 20000 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SMT. NAGALAKSHMI @ LAKSHMI, DAUGHTER OF LATE K.KRISHNAPPA, WIFE OF JAYAKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF NO.20, 14TH CROSS, JM PALYA, BHYRASANDRA ROAD, CV RAMAN NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 093, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.407, SLV HERITAGE, 4^TH FLOOR, 5^TH MAIN, JAGADISHNAGAR, NTS POST, BENGALURU - 560 075.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

(BY SRI DAYANANDA MURTHY P.R., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

SRI K. NAGENDRA BABU, SON OF LATE K.KRISHNAPPA, SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS

¶15

SMT. RENUKA, WIFE OF LATE K.NAGENDRA BABU, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS.

¶16

SRI RAKESH, SON OF K.NAGENDRA BABU, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,

¶17

¶18

NC: 2026:KHC:33505 WP No. 20000 of 2026

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

BOTH R1 & R2 ARE RESIDING AT NO.2, GANDADHAGUDI HOUSE, LAKSHMI THEATER ROAD, ANEKAL, BENGALURU – 562 106.

¶21

SMT. K.SHAILAJA, DAUGHTER OF LATE K. KRISHNAPPA, WIFE OF SUNDAR RAJ, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 10, NEW STREET, CHETTY GARDEN, IYANVARAM, CHENNAI - 600 082.

¶22

SMT. VENKATAMMA, WIFE OF NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, RESIDING AT 18^TH CROSS, KAGGADASPURA, C.V.RAMAN NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 093.

¶23

SRI CHANDRASHEKAR, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT VINUTHA TABLE BRICKS NO.29, 2^ND A MAIN, 14TH CROSS, VIJNANANAGAR, NEW THIPPASANDRA POST, BENGALURU - 560 075.

¶24

SRI AMARESH, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.19, VIJNANA NAGAR, NARAYANA REDDY MAIN ROAD, C.V.RAMAN NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 075.

¶25

SRI GANESH, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,

¶26

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:33505 WP No. 20000 of 2026

¶27

HC-KAR

¶28

RESIDING AT 18^TH CROSS, KAGGADASPURA, C.V.RAMAN NAGAR POST, BENGALURU – 560 093.

¶29

SMT. K.UMADEVI, WIFE OF LOKESH, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, RESIDING AT YALETHOTADA PALYA, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 562 138.

¶30

SMT. MANJULA, WIFE OF LAKSHMAIAH, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RESIDING AT IYATHARAHALLI, BHUDAGERE POST, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 129.

¶31

…RESPONDENTS

¶32

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO PASS AN ORDER PARTICULARLY IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE TRIAL COURT TO HEAR AND DISPOSE OF IA.NO.2, APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 151 OF CPC, IN FDP 75/2024 PENDING DISPOSAL OF OTHER APPLICATIONS ON THE FILE OF IA.NO.2 ON THE OF XVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU PARTICULARLY SHOWN AS ANNEXURE-E BY GIVING A TIME FRAME AND ETC.,

¶33

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶34

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶35

¶36

NC: 2026:KHC:33505 WP No. 20000 of 2026

¶37

HC-KAR

¶38

ORAL ORDER

¶39

The present writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:

¶40

“PRAYER

¶41

The petitioner most respectfully states that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to:

¶42

a. Pass an order particularly in the nature of Mandamus directing the Trial court to hear and dispose of IA No.2, Application filed under Section 151 of CPC, in FDP 75/2024 pending disposal of IA. No.2 on the file of XVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru particularly shown as Annexure-E by giving a time frame; and

¶43

b. Pass any other order as this Hon'ble Court deems fit, in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶44

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that I.A.No.2 was filed in the year 2024 in the Final Decree Proceedings. Even till now, the said application has not been considered by the trial Court.

¶45

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner,

¶46

perused the entire material on record. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is passing the following order:

¶47

5 - NC: 2026:KHC:33505 WP No. 20000 of 2026

¶48

HC-KAR

¶49

ORDER

¶50

i. The XVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, is requested to dispose of I.A.No.2 in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶51

ii. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of .

¶52

iii. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed.

¶53

SD/(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

¶54

MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25

Smt Nagalakshmi @ Lakshmi v. Sri K Nagendra Babu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Nagalakshmi @ Lakshmi v. Sri K Nagendra Babu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. Safiya Vs Mr. K Shabir

M/S G G Finance Corporation Finance and Investment Vs v Thimma Reddy

Mr Abdul Jabbar Vs Smt Devarasam

Sri Anand Vs Sri Chinnappa Reddy

Dinesh @ Rama Dinesh Ramappa Vs Sadashiva

Smt. Shruti Babu Vs Sri. Kaleemulla