Dismissed¶¶26

Syed Saadat v. Dr Rubina Sulthana

Karnataka HC24 Jun 2026WP/19816/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC; W.P. 19816/2025 (GM-FC); Articles 226/227 Constitution; Section 125(3) Cr.P.C; certiorari against Family Court Tumakuru order dated 21.05.2025 on I.A No. III; Crl. Misc. No. 331/2024; maintenance proceedings; respondent unrepresented; amicable settlement; withdrawal permitted; dismissed as withdrawn; no ruling on merits.

What did the court decide?

Permission accorded to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn. ¶¶26

Why is it important?

Syed Saadat Vs Dr Rubina Sulthana — Maintenance and Alimony | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:31489 WP No. 19816 of 2025

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 19816 OF 2025 (GM-FC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SYED SAADAT S/O SYED SADIQ SAB, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT MARUTHINAGARA, HULIYAR VILLAGE AND HOBLI, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK, TUMAKURU - 572218

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. SYED ARIF PASHA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.LETHIF B.,ADVOCATE) AND:

¶11

Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

DR RUBINA SULTHANA W/O RAZIUR RAHAMAN, D/O SIKANDARPAHSA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT FLOOR MILL ROAD, VEERASARA, TUMAKURU - 572101

¶13

…RESPONDENT

¶14

(BY SRI. MOHAN S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

¶15

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND ISSUE WRIT OR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 21.05.2025 PASSED BY THE PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, TUMAKURU ON I.A NO. III UNDER SECTION 125(3) OF CR.P.C AND ALL THE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED AGAINST THIS PETITIONER IN CRL. MISC. NO. 331/2024 WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A,

¶16

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:31489 WP No. 19816 of 2025

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED U/S 125(3) OF CR.PC AT IA NO.III WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-J. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶19

CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶20

ORAL ORDER

¶21

No representation on respondent's side on call.

¶22

Sri.Syed Arif Pasha representing Sri.Lethif.B learned

¶23

counsel on record for the petitioner submits that the disputes between the parties were resolved amicably and thus, the writ petition has become infructuous. Seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.

¶24

In the light of the submission thus made, permission

¶25

as prayed for is accorded.

¶26

Writ petition is thereby dismissed as withdrawn.

¶27

Sd/(DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE

¶28

DS CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41

Syed Saadat v. Dr Rubina Sulthana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

Syed Saadat v. Dr Rubina Sulthana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Chetan Kale Vs Mrs Nilam Kale

Sri. Ravi Kumar. B Vs Sri. Santhosh v. C.

Mr Inderjit Yadav Vs Mrs Prakruthi M

Sri K C Nagaraju Vs Smt C P Nandini

Smt. Sarika Mohan Vs Balaji Kumar

Sri Shaik Mukhtar Vs Smt Saqida @ Gohar Jan