Disposed

Mr Chetan Kale v. Mrs Nilam Kale

Karnataka HC23 Jun 2026RPFC/144/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed the petitioner's request to convert a revision petition under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act into a writ petition, noting that interim orders under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act are not maintainable in revision. The revision petition is deemed disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to convert revision petition to writ petition; revision petition deemed disposed of.

Mr Chetan Kale Vs Mrs Nilam Kale — Matrimonial and Divorce | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:31094 RPFC No. 144 of 2026

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 23^RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 144 OF 2026

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

MR CHETAN KALE S/O. VASANT KALE, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT, C/O. K.N.GUPTA, 180, 12TH MAIN ROAD, 69TH CROSS ROAD, 5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU-560010. KARNATAKA.

¶9

CURRENTLY RESIDING AT: MECHANICAL DESIGNER IN PRIVATE LTD., Digitally signed BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA by AASEEFA PARVEEN REPRESENTED BY SPA HOLDER Location: HIGH SRI. VASANTH RAMCHNDRA KALE. COURT OF …PETITIONER KARNATAKA (BY SRI. B.V.M.ADEKAR, ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

MRS. NILAM KALE, W/O. CHETAN KALE, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT C/O. SMT. MATAM NANDAKUMAR GAJAGESHWAR

¶12

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:31094 RPFC No. 144 of 2026

¶13

HC-KAR

¶14

1064 D-WARD, SHUKRAVARAPETE JOSHI GALLI, KOLHAPUR, STATE : MAHARASHTRA, PIN CODE: 416002.

¶15

…RESPONDENT

¶16

THIS RPFC FILED U/S. 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACT PRAYING TO AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24.04.2026, PASSED ON I.A.NO.6 IN MC NO.2533/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE I.A.NO.6 FILED U/S. 24 OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT FOR MAINTENANCE.

¶17

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶18

CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶19

ORAL ORDER

¶20

Memo filed seeking permission to convert this revision petition into a writ petition is on record.

¶21

2. Sri.B.V.M.Adekar learned counsel for the

¶22

petitioner submits that petitioner challenged the order rendered in an interlocutory application and thus, revision

¶23

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:31094 RPFC No. 144 of 2026

¶24

HC-KAR

¶25

petition is not maintainable. Learned counsel thereby seeks permission to convert this revision petition into a writ petition.

¶26

3. On hearing the submission of learned counsel

¶27

for the petitioner and on going through the contents of the memo filed, permission as prayed for is accorded. Petitioner shall carry out necessary amendments for conversion of this revision petition into a writ petition.

¶28

Other office objections if any pending should also be complied with.

¶29

For all practical purposes this revision petition shall

¶30

be deemed to be disposed of.

¶31

Sd/(DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE

¶32

DS CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4

Mr Chetan Kale v. Mrs Nilam Kale

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr Chetan Kale v. Mrs Nilam Kale

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Pravin Naidu Vs Smt S Pooja Sree

Dr Vivekananda M Vs Dr Bharathi v

Dr. Bharathi. v Vs Dr. Vivekananda M

Sri. Ramraja M Asrani Vs Smt. Sakshi R Asrani @ Santosh

Sri. Ravi Kumar. B Vs Sri. Santhosh v. C.

Mr Inderjit Yadav Vs Mrs Prakruthi M