Shanthamma v. Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court (Bengaluru), WP No. 16738 of 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR), decided 15 June 2026 by E.S. Indiresh, J. Keywords: Article 226 mandamus; revenue records mutation; R.T.C change of entries; khata issuance; land grant 24.03.2004; 10 guntas in Sy. No.178, Vishwanathapura Village, Kundana Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District; representation dated 20/05/2025 Annexure-F to Tahsildar Devanahalli; direction to decide in accordance with law within four months after verifying original records; disposed of at preliminary hearing; HCGP Sri Spoorthy Hegde N. for respondents; advocate Sri Sanath Kumar Shetty K. for petitioner. No case law cited; useful only as an authority on directions to consider representations, not on merits of mutation.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent No.1 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 20.05.2025 (Annexure-F) after verifying the original records and take a decision in accordance with law within a period of four months from receipt of a copy of the order; writ petition disposed of accordingly.