Disposed¶31

Smt Radhamma v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC15 Jun 2026WP/17573/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition disposed of by single judge (E.S. Indiresh, J.) on 15.06.2026; direction sought against Assistant Director of Land Records and Tahsildar, Anekal Taluk, for phodi of subject land at Yadavanahalli Village, Attibele Hobli; representation dated 12.02.2026 as per Annexure-A; liberty granted to apply through online portal; application to be considered at the earliest; no costs or quantum; neutral citation NC: 2026:KHC:28896.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to make an online application as required under law seeking phodi in respect of the said land; the same shall be considered at the earliest. ¶31

Smt Radhamma Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:28896 WP No. 17573 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 17573 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SMT. RADHAMMA W/O LATE MUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT YADAVANAHALLI VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. KUMAR J.C., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

¶15

Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶16

THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT.

¶17

THE TAHSILDAR ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT.

¶18

…RESPONDENTS

¶19

(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA)

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 12.02.2026 AS PER ANNEXURES-A AND ETC.

¶21

¶22

NC: 2026:KHC:28896 WP No. 17573 of 2026

¶23

HC-KAR

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

Learned AGA accepts notice for respondents.

¶28

The petitioner is seeking a direction on respondent

¶29

Nos.2 and 3 to conduct phodi in respect of the subject land.

¶30

In this regard, learned AGA submits that if an application is made through the online portal seeking phodi in respect of the subject land, the same shall be considered by the respondent authorities in accordance with law.

¶31

With this observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. However, it is open for the petitioner to make an online application as required under law seeking phodi in respect of the said land and the same shall be considered at the earliest.

¶32

SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶33

VBS

¶34

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42

Smt Radhamma v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Radhamma v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chowdamma Vs State of Karnataka

K Kumara Vs State of Karnataka

Y M Ningegowda Vs Marilingaiah

S Sudarshanam Vs State of Karnataka

Sri a B Manohar Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Venkateshappa Vs State of Karnataka