Disposed¶35

Sri Avalappa v. the Deputy Commissioner

Karnataka HC9 Jun 2026WP/16726/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC (Kolar land-records writ, Art. 227, KLR-RR/SUR): agriculturist petitioner sought consideration of representations dated 29.12.2020 and 17.03.2021 and RTC updation; Deputy Commissioner/Assistant Commissioner/Tahsildar, Kolar, directed to consider them in accordance with law within four months; disposed of without expressing opinion on merits. Keywords: RTC updation, pending representation, Article 227 writ, Kolar taluk, four-month timeline.

What did the court decide?

Respondents Nos.1 to 3 directed to consider the petitioner's representations dated 29.12.2020 and 17.03.2021 (Annexures-B, E, F and G) in accordance with law within four months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. ¶35

Sri Avalappa Vs the Deputy Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:27393 WP No. 16726 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 16726 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI AVALAPPA S/O LATE A NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURIST, R/O HULALI VILLAGE, HUTTUR HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT - 563 101.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. KANTHARAJAPPA M G., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR - 563 101.

¶15

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KOLAR SUB-DIVISION, KOLAR - 563 101.

¶16

THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KOLAR TALUK - 563101 KOLAR.

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SRI SPOORTHY HEGDE.N., HCGP)

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:27393 WP No. 16726 of 2026

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER DATED 29.12.2020 AND 17.03.2021 AND FOR UPDATING THE RTC IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER AS PER REPRESENTATIONS DATED 29.12.2020 AND 17.03.2021 ARE PRODUCED AS ANNEXURES-B, E, F AND G TO THE WRIT PETITION. (B) ISSUE ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION AS THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE INCLUDING AS TO THE COST IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

The learned HCGP accepts notice for respondents.

¶27

2. The grievance of the petitioner is to consider

¶28

representation produced at Annexures-B, E, F and G by Respondent Nos.1 to 3, which has not been done till date.

¶29

¶30

NC: 2026:KHC:27393 WP No. 16726 of 2026

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

3. In that view of the matter, without expressing

¶33

any opinion on merits of the case, respondents are directed to consider the same, in accordance with law within a period of four months from the date of receipt of

¶34

copy of this order. Accordingly, writ petition stands

¶35

disposed of.

¶36

SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶37

DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36

Sri Avalappa v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Avalappa v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri H M Himachalapathi Vs State of Karnataka

Mr Gilbert D Souza Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Mahadevamma Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Smt. Kamalamma Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Munilakshmamma Vs Tahsildar

Smt. Surya Puthri Vs the State of Karnataka