Dismissed¶30

Mr. Misbha Uddin Naser v. J C Flowers Asset Reconstruction Private Limited

Karnataka HC8 Jun 2026WP/16594/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 16594 of 2026 (GM-DRT); Justice Jyoti M; oral order dated 08-06-2026; petitioners Misbha Uddin Naser and Mamatha Govindaraju (advocate Pradeep Kumar P.K.); respondents J.C. Flowers Asset Reconstruction Private Limited, its Authorised Officer, and RBL Bank; writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution; withdrawal of writ petition at preliminary hearing; dismissal as withdrawn on counsel's conscious decision; undertaking not to seek review or modification; pending interlocutory applications disposed of; no adjudication on merits.

What the court decided

AI extract

Mr. Misbha Uddin Naser Vs J C Flowers Asset… — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:27097 WP No. 16594 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 16594 OF 2026 (GM-DRT)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

MR. MISBHA UDDIN NASER S/O LATE HABIB UDDIN AHMED AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.124, SFS 208, OPP MOTHER DAIRY, YELAHANKA NEW TOWN, BENGALURU-560064.

¶9

Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶10

MRS. MAMATHA GOVINDARAJU, D/O. GOVINDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, REGISTERED OFFICE: GOVIANU NO.385, 13TH CROSS, BASHYAM CIRCLE, SADASHIVANAGAR, BENGALURU- 560080.

¶11

…PETITIONERS

¶12

(BY SRI. PRADEEP KUMAR P.K., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

J.C.FLOWERS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED REGISTER UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2002 REGISTERED OFFICE AT 203-206, 2ND FLOOR, WING A, INSPIRE BKC, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA (EAST) MUMBAI - 400051.

¶15

¶16

NC: 2026:KHC:27097 WP No. 16594 of 2026

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

ALSO AT 43 RESIDENCY ROAD, SHANTALA NAGAR - ASHOK NAGAR, BENGALURU-560025. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER

¶19

AUTHORISED OFFICER OF J.C FLOWERS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2002 REGISTERED OFFICE AT 203-206, 2ND FLOOR, WING A, INSPIRE BKC, BANDRA KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA (EAST) MUMBAI - 400051. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER

¶20

RBL BANK BRANCH OFFICE 16TH FLOOR, EMPIRE TOWER, RELIABLE TECH PARK, OFF. THANE-BELAPUR ROAD, AIROLI, NAVI, MUMBAI-400708.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶23

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶24

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:27097 WP No. 16594 of 2026

¶25

HC-KAR

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

Sri.Pradeep Kumar P.K., counsel for the petitioners appeared in person.

¶28

After arguing the matter for sometime, counsel for the petitioners submits that petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioners submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioners shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order.

¶29

The oral submission is placed on record.

¶30

As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶31

Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.

¶32

Sd/(JYOTI M) JUDGE

¶33

¶34

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5

Mr. Misbha Uddin Naser v. J C Flowers Asset Reconstruction Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Mr. Misbha Uddin Naser v. J C Flowers Asset Reconstruction Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hareesha K M, Vs Karnataka Bank Ltd.

Smt L Manjula Vs Sri. N. Sathish.

U Vasulingappa Vs State Bank of India

Vijaya Education Institute Trust Vs Controlling Authority

Sri S Kumar Vs M/S Gemini Distilleries

Sri J Ashok Vs the State Bank of India