Smt L Manjula v. Sri. N. Sathish.

Karnataka HC5 Jun 2026MSA/4/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

MSA No. 4 of 2026, High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, decided 05-06-2026 by Ms. Justice Jyoti M: miscellaneous second appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 CPC permitted to be withdrawn at the appellants' request so that a writ petition may be filed; appeal disposed of for statistical purposes with liberty to file the writ petition; originals returned against Xerox copies. No cases cited, no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the appeal and liberty to file a writ petition. ¶¶35

Smt L Manjula Vs Sri. N. Sathish. — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:26649 MSA No. 4 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 4 OF 2026

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SMT. L.MANJULA

¶9

W/O. LATE P.GOPAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 90/2, VI MAIN, 15TH CROSS, APPA REDDY PALYA,

¶10

INDIRANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 038.

¶11

SMT. VARSHA G., W/O. SRI. NISHANTH, D/O. LATE P.GOPAL REDDY. AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, RESIDING AT SOHANI KUTEERA. PARAPPANA AGRAHARA, BENGALURU-560068.

¶12

Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

KUM. AMISHA RAJI GOPAL @ CHARANYA. D/O. LATE P.GOPAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,

¶14

KUM. HARSHINI G.REDDY, D/O. LATE P.GOPAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS,

¶15

APPELLANT NO.4 SINCE MINOR IS REPRESENTED BY THE MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, SMT. L.MANJULA W/O. LATE P.GOPAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

¶16

¶17

NC: 2026:KHC:26649 MSA No. 4 of 2026

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

APPELLANTS NO.3 AND 4 ARE RESIDING AT NO. 90/2, VI MAIN, 15TH CROSS, APPA REDDY PALYA, INDIRANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 038.

¶20

…APPELLANTS

¶21

(BY SRI. RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. MANJULA L., ADVOCATE)

¶22

AND:

¶23

SRI. N.SATHISH, S/O. SRI. P.NAGARAJ REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING NEAR ANJANEYASWAMY TEMPLE, DODDANAGAMANGALA VILLAGE, ELECTRONIC CITY POST, BENGALURU-560068.

¶24

…RESPONDENT

¶25

(BY SRI. T.SHESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE FOR C/R)

¶26

THIS MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

¶27

THIS MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER:

¶28

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶29

Sri.Ramesh, counsel on behalf of Smt.Manjula L., for the appellants appeared in person and submits that the appellants may be permitted to withdraw the appeal and file a writ petition.

¶30

¶31

NC: 2026:KHC:26649 MSA No. 4 of 2026

¶32

HC-KAR

¶33

Submission is noted. Permission is granted.

¶34

For statistical purpose, the appeal is disposed of . Liberty

¶35

is accordingly accorded to file writ petition.

¶36

Office to return all the originals by replacing it with Xerox

¶37

copies.

¶38

Sd/(JYOTI M) JUDGE

¶39

¶40

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21

Smt L Manjula v. Sri. N. Sathish.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt L Manjula v. Sri. N. Sathish.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thyagappa Vs the Managing Director

Bifr Vs M/S Ngef Ltd.

Chaturbhuj L Vs Official Liquidator of Vajra Cements and Minerals Private Limited (in Liqn)

M/S. Shoma Automation Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Bank of India

Sri Mohammed Rafik Vs Equitas Small Finance Bank Limited

Smt. Sumangala Vs Equitas Small Finance Bank Limited