Dismissed¶40

Smt Leevathi v. Laxmi

Karnataka HC4 Feb 2026WP/15744/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WP No. 15744 of 2022 (GM-CPC), High Court of Karnataka, decided 04.02.2026 by Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju: writ petition challenging the order dated 27.10.2021 on I.A. No.9 in O.S.No.304/2015 (1st Additional Civil Judge, Bhadravathi) and consequential orders dated 16-06-2022 and 11.07.2022 was dismissed in default and for non-prosecution because the underlying suit had abated; petition held infructuous; pending applications closed. No merits decided; no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Since the underlying suit in O.S.No.304/2015 stands abated, the present writ petition has become infructuous. ¶40

Smt Leevathi Vs Laxmi — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:6433 WP No. 15744 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 4^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 15744 OF 2022 (GM-CPC)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SMT. LEEVATHI W/O B.C.SHASHIKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, RESIDENT OF HALLIKERE VILLAGE, BARANDUR POST, BHADRAVATHI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577 201.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. RUDRAYYA MAHESHAIAH HIREMATHAD. ADVOCATE[ABSENT])

¶13

AND:

¶14

LAXMI

¶15

W/O LATE NAGARAJA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

¶16

OCC: HOUSEWIFE,

¶17

SHARATH

¶18

S/O LATE NAGARAJA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS,

¶19

OCC: STUDENT,

¶20

BOTH RESIDENTS OF BULLAPURA, BYE PASS ROAD, BHADRAVATHI, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577 201.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

¶23

NC: 2026:KHC:6433 WP No. 15744 of 2022

¶24

HC-KAR

¶25

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD. 27.10.2021 PASSED ON I.A. NO.9 IN O.S.NO.304/2015 CONSEQUENTLY QUASHING THE ORDERS DTD. 16-06-2022 AND THE ORDER 11.07.2022 PASSED IN O.S.NO. 304/2015 BY THE 1ST ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AT BHADRAVATHI PRODUCED AT ANNX-A AND PASS AN ORDER RESTORING THE SUIT OF THE PLAINTIFF IN TO FILE OF THE COURT.

¶26

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶28

ORAL ORDER

¶29

1. None appears for the petitioner.

¶30

On the last date of hearing, this Court had passed the

¶31

following order:

¶32

“1. The present petition has been filed seeking to challenge the order dated 27.10.2021 passed on I.A.No.9 in O.S.No.304/2015 and further consequential orders.

¶33

2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the suit has stood abated and thus the petition has become infructuous. The copy of the order dated 16.06.2022 in this behalf has been handed over to the Court.

¶34

3. Since the suit stands abated, the present petition would also become infructuous.”

¶35

4. Since none appears for the parties on the second call, in the interest of justice, adverse orders are deferred.

¶36

5. List this matter on 04.02.2026.”

¶37

¶38

NC: 2026:KHC:6433 WP No. 15744 of 2022

¶39

HC-KAR

¶40

Since the suit stands abated, the present petition would also become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.

¶41

All pending applications stand closed.

¶42

Digitally signed by TARA VITASTA GANJU Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE

¶43

YN. List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4

Smt Leevathi v. Laxmi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Leevathi v. Laxmi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri C Mahadeva Shetty Vs Sri C Nagashetty

Sri Mohan R Vs Smt Anjali M @ Anjali Madankumar

Smt Fathimmunnisa Vs Miss Razeena Sahrin

Smt Balamma Vs Sri Jaganath v Pai

M/S. Shalimar Agarbatti Company Vs Savita Nitin Shah

United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Vs Vanajakshi