Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No.14874 of 2021 (GM-CPC); Hon'ble Ms. Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju; decided 03.02.2026; writ under Article 227 of the Constitution of India; certiorari; amendment of plaint; Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC; O.S No.27180/2011; IA No.1/2021; 74th Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-75), Mayo Hall; consent disposal; limitation findings not to bind petitioner; rights and contentions left open; additional written statement within three weeks; additional replication/re-joinder; no unnecessary adjournments.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of on consensus: (i) Trial Court's findings on the Order 6 Rule 17 application will not preclude the petitioner from taking objections to the amendments sought by the respondents; (ii) rights and contentions of both parties left open to be agitated before the Trial Court; (iii) petitioner permitted to file additional written statement within three weeks, respondents may file additional replication/re-joinder before the next date of hearing; parties bound not to take unnecessary adjournments.