Dismissed¶¶34

Mr Chethan D v. M/S Hinduja Housing Finance Limited

Karnataka HC2 Jul 2026WP/15184/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; Writ Petition No. 15184 of 2026 (GM-DRT) under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India; petitioners Chethan D. and Shashikala B.P. versus Hinduja Housing Finance Limited; dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's request with undertaking not to seek review or modification; no merits adjudication, no cases cited, no quantum involved; pending interlocutory applications disposed of.

What the court decided

AI extract

Mr Chethan D Vs M/S Hinduja Housing Finance Limited — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:32859 WP No. 15184 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 15184 OF 2026 (GM-DRT)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

MR. CHETHAN D., S/O. BASAVARAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/AT NO.32, LINGAYATHARA STREET, DYAMENAHALLI VILLAGE, BADA POST, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 514.

¶9

MRS. SHASHIKALA B.P., W/O. BASAVARAJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/AT NO.32, LINGAYATHARA STREET, DYAMENAHALLI VILLAGE, BADA POST, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 514.

¶10

Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶11

(BY SMT. PRIYANKA M.R., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SHIVU L.V., ADVOCATE)

¶12

…PETITIONERS

¶13

AND:

¶14

M/S. HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 27-A, DEVELOPED INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, GUINDY, CHENNAI - 600 032.

¶15

ALSO HAVING BRANCH OFFICE AT NO.318/9, 1ST FLOOR, AMV PLAZA, RING ROAD, VINAYAK NAGAR, DAVANAGERE - 577 001.

¶16

¶17

NC: 2026:KHC:32859 WP No. 15184 of 2026

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER.

¶20

…RESPONDENT

¶21

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

Smt.Priyanka M.R., counsel on behalf of Sri.Shivu

¶25

L.V., for the petitioners appeared in person.

¶26

Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioners submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioners shall not seek review

¶27

of the order or modification of the order.

¶28