Smt. Anusuya v. Chief Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka HC (Bengaluru), Justice B M Shyam Prasad, 2 June 2026, WP No. 13758 of 2025 (LB-RES): writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 challenging mutation/revenue-entry change order dated 28-11-2024 by Chief Officer, Town Municipal Council, Lingasugur, in favour of respondents 2-7 (Shivashankar Rao, Chdrashekhar K. Umaluti, Ramanath U., Somanath U., Yogendra Rao, Amruth Rao) for house property Sy. No. 3-6-12, Kasaba Lingasugur village, Raichur District (Annexure-H). Dismissed from this Bench on venue grounds only - petitioner resides in Bangalore, subject property in Raichur District - and disposed of with liberty, subject to just exceptions, to seek remedy before the appropriate bench. No merits adjudication; no cases cited; no amounts involved. Useful for bench/territorial-jurisdiction routing of Article 226 petitions, not for mutation-order merits.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to the petitioner, subject to just exceptions, to avail remedy before the appropriate bench in respect of her grievance against the first respondent's mutation order.