Gangadhar v. Rani
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution/default: appellants Gangadhar and Mahesh made no representation; matter listed for the eighth time; seven registry objections unrectified. Underlying chain: decree dated 07.11.2020 in O.S.No.47/2014 (Prl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Hunsur) upheld by judgment and decree dated 06.03.2024 in RA.No.02/2021 (Prl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Hunsur). Keywords: Section 100 CPC; Regular Second Appeal; dismissal for non-prosecution; registry objections; Karnataka High Court; Hunsur.
What did the court decide?
No representation appeared for the appellants; the appeal had been listed for the eighth time and the seven registry objections raised remained unrectified, so it appeared the appellants were not interested in prosecuting the matter. ¶34