Dismissed¶32

Sri. Shaik Ajmal Pash v. Smt. H.G. Leelavathamma

Karnataka HC10 Jun 2026RSA/80/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RSA No. 80 of 2017 (DEC/INJ), High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, V Srishananda J., decided 10.06.2026 — second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution for non-appearance of the appellant and non-filing of paper books despite orders dated 12.08.2025 and 03.09.2025; filed under S. 100 CPC against the RA No. 40/2009 judgment dated 13.04.2016 confirming the OS No. 70/2000 decree dated 25.02.2009 of the Tumakuru courts; no merits decided, no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

The appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution: none appeared for the appellant and paper books were not filed despite orders dated 12.08.2025 and 03.09.2025. ¶32

Sri. Shaik Ajmal Pash Vs Smt. H.G. Leelavathamma — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:27860 RSA No. 80 of 2017

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 80 OF 2017 (DEC/INJ)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. SHAIK AJMAL PASH, S/O. SHAIK MOHAMMED,AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, PROP. LOTUS ENTERPRISES, 11^TH CROSS, POOR HOUSE COLONY, TUMKURU-572 101,

¶10

NOW RESIDENT OF N. K. WOOD INDUSTRIES, OLD ELECTRIC COLONY, BAR LINE, TUMKURU-572 101,

¶11

…APPELLANT

¶12

(BY SRI M B RYAKHA, N S SRINIVAS MURTHY & SUNIL KUMAR P BANGARI, ADVOCATES) AND:

¶13

SMT H.G. LEELAVATHAMMA W/O LATE T.G.M. ARADHYA,AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,

¶14

Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

SRI ARJUN S/O LATE T.G.M. ARADHYA,AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,

¶16

SRI ARUN S/O. LATE T.G.M. ARADHYA,AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

¶17

SRI ALLAMAPRABHU S/O LATE T.G.M. ARADHYA,AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,

¶18

SRI RAVI, S/O. LATE T.G.M. ARADHYA,AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

¶19

RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO 5 ARE RESIDENT OF K.R. EXTENSION,

¶20

¶21

NC: 2026:KHC:27860 RSA No. 80 of 2017

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

2^ND CROSS, TUMKURU-572 102.

¶24

…RESPONDENTS

¶25

(BY SRI G S PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2, NOTICE TO R3 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED, V/O/DT 15.12.2017 NOTICE TO R4 & R5 ARE H/S)

¶26

THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC.,AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.04.2016 PASSED IN RA NO. 40/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE CJM TUMAKURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED25.02.2009 PASSED IN OS NO. 70/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR. DN.) JMFC TUMAKURU.

¶27

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶28

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶29

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶30

None appears for the appellant. Paper books not filed

¶31

despite orders dated 12.08.2025 and 03.09.2025. Accordingly,

¶32

appeal stand dismissed for non-prosecution.