Nagalakshmi v. Chandramohan Reddy
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; RSA No. 1725 of 2025 (SP); Section 100 CPC second appeal from Pavagada (Tumakuru District); appellants Nagalakshmi and six others; respondent Chandramohan Reddy; counsel Abhinay Y.T; dismissed for non-prosecution on 10.06.2026 as no one appeared for the appellants; Office objection under Section 49, Karnataka Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act regarding non-payment of court fee noted; no merits argued, no precedent discussed; underlying decrees: O.S. No.62/2016 (08.04.2019, Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Pavagada) confirmed by R.A. No. 67/2019 (09.04.2025, Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Pavagada).
What did the court decide?
The regular second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, none having appeared for the appellants when the case was called twice; no question on the merits of the dispute was considered or decided.