Chikkamma v. Devegowda
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; RSA No. 762 of 2023 (PAR); Sec.100 CPC second appeal; dismissed for non-prosecution on 06-01-2026 by Justice Ravi V Hosmani; non-compliance of office objections ('V' time); appellant's advocate absent; impugned judgment/decree 27.09.2022 in R.A. No. 305/2021 (I Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Mysuru) confirming decree 10.03.2020 in O.S. No. 881/2013 (II Addl. Senior Civil Judge & CJM, Mysuru); parties: Chikkamma v. Hoovamma, Marigowda, Sunitha (LRs of late Devegowda); NC: 2026:KHC:848; no merits adjudicated, no precedent cited.
What did the court decide?
The appellant, despite sufficient earlier opportunity and a direction to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours, made no representation and left the office objections un-complied, indicating that the appellant was not diligently pursuing the appeal.