Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Smt Shekramma Vs Sri Deveerappa — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Home
Karnataka HC
2026
Smt Shekramma Vs Sri DeveerappaSmt Shekramma v. Sri Deveerappa

Dismissed¶34

Smt Shekramma v. Sri Deveerappa

Karnataka HC6 Jan 2026RSA/1760/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

NC: 2026:KHC:845 — High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, single Bench (Ravi V Hosmani, J.), decided 06.01.2026. RSA No. 1760 of 2024 (DEC/INJ) under Section 100 CPC by Shekramma, Kamalamma and K S Ranganath against Deveerappa, Anjanappa and the LRs of Kenchamma, against the concurrent decrees of the Tarikere courts (R.A. No. 6/2024 dated 12.09.2024 confirming O.S. No.153/2015 dated 07.02.2024). Dismissed for non-prosecution on account of non-compliance of office objections for the fourth time and absence of representation; no ruling on merits; no cases cited; no monetary reliefs.

What did the court decide?

Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted earlier, and a direction to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours, there was no representation and the office objections remained un-complied, indicating that the appellants were not diligently pursuing the appeal.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Issue for consideration

Whether the Regular Second Appeal ought to be dismissed for non-prosecution in view of the appellants' repeated non-compliance with office objections and absence of representation.

Court's answer

Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted earlier, and a direction to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours, there was no representation and the office objections remained un-complied, indicating that the appellants were not diligently pursuing the appeal.

Ratio / Principle

The Regular Second Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Regular Second Appeal No. 1760 of 2024 (DEC/INJ) under Sec. 100 CPC, filed by Smt. Shekramma, Smt. Kamalamma and K S Ranganath against Sri Deveerappa, Sri Anjanappa and the legal representatives of the deceased third respondent Smt. Kenchamma, challenging the judgment and decree dated 12.09.2024 in R.A. No. 6/2024 (Senior Civil Judge and Prl. JMFC, Tarikere), whereby the first appeal was dismissed and the judgment and decree dated 07.02.2024 in O.S. No.153/2015 (Civil Judge and Additional JMFC, Tarikere) was confirmed. The matter was listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for the fourth time; despite sufficient opportunity and a direction to comply till closure of Court hours, there was no representation and the objections remained un-complied. Held (Ravi V Hosmani, J., 06.01.2026): the conduct indicated the appellants were not diligently pursuing the appeal; the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. No adjudication on the merits; no precedents cited.

A

1 -

NC: 2026:KHC:845 RSA No. 1760 of 2024

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1760 OF 2024 (DEC/INJ)

BETWEEN:

SMT.SHEKRAMMA

LATE ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS R/O BEGURAIAH STEET TARIKER POST AND TALUK CHIKAMANGALUR DISTSRICT-577 228.

SMT.KAMALAMMA W/O YOGESHAPPA AGED 69 YEARS AGRICULTURIST SHIVANI VILLAGE SHIVANI HOBLI AJJAMPURA TALUK CHIKAMAGALUR DISTRICT-585 411.

K S RANGANATH S/O LATE SANNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O SHIVANI VILLAGE, SHIVANI HOBLI AJJAMPURA TALUK CHIKAMAGALUR DISTRICT-585 411.

Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka

…APPELLANTS

[BY SRI KAMARAJU, ADVOCATE (AB)]

AND:

SRI DEVEERAPPA S/O LATE KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/O SHIVANI VILLAGE SHIVANI HOBLI AJJAMPURA TALUK CHIKAMAGALUR DISTRICT-585 411.

2 -

NC: 2026:KHC:845 RSA No. 1760 of 2024

HC-KAR

SRI ANJANAPPA S/O LATE KARIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/O SHIVANI VILLAGE SHIVANI HOBLI AJJAMPURA TALUK CHIKAMAGALUR DISTRICT-585 411.

SMT. KENCHAMMA W/O LATE SANNAIAH AGEDA BOUT 70 YEARS AGRUCULTURIST SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS

(A) BASAVARAJAPPA S/O LATE SANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/O SHIVANI VILLAGE SHIVANI HOLBI AJJAMPRUA TALUK CHIKAMAGALUR DISTRICT-585 411.

(B) HANUMANTHAPPA S/O LATE SANNAIAH R/O SHIVANI VILLAGE SHIVANI HOBLI AJJAMPURA TALUK CHIKAMAGALUR DISTRICT-585 411.

…RESPONDENTS

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.09.2024. PASSED IN RA NO. 6/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND PRL. JMFC, TARIKERE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.02.2024 PASSED IN OS NO.153/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL JMFC, TARIKERE.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS , THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

3 -

NC: 2026:KHC:845 RSA No. 1760 of 2024

HC-KAR

ORAL JUDGMENT

This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for IV time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellants were directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellants are not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE

List No.: 2 Sl No.: 77

AV

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the Regular Second Appeal ought to be dismissed for non-prosecution in view of the appellants' repeated non-compliance with office objections and absence of representation.medium confidence¶34
The court held
Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted earlier, and a direction to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours, there was no representation and the office objections remained un-complied, indicating that the appellants were not diligently pursuing the appeal.ratio¶34

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Code of Civil ProcedureSection 100¶27

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Judgment and decree dated 12.09.2024 in R.A. No. 6/2024 dismissing the first appeal and confirming the trial court's judgment and decree in O.S. No.153/2015.¶27
Senior Civil Judge and Prl. JMFC, Tarikere · 12.09.2024
Prior proceeding
Suit O.S. No.153/2015 decided by judgment and decree dated 07.02.2024 by the Civil Judge and Additional JMFC, Tarikere.¶27
Prior proceeding
First appeal R.A. No. 6/2024 before the Senior Civil Judge and Prl. JMFC, Tarikere was dismissed by judgment and decree dated 12.09.2024, confirming the trial court's decree.¶27

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
Smt. Shekramma¶10
Sri Kamaraju
appellant
Smt. Kamalamma W/o Yogeshappa¶12
Sri Kamaraju
appellant
K S Ranganath S/o Late Sannaiah¶13
Sri Kamaraju
respondent
Sri Deveerappa S/o Late Kariyappa¶18
respondent
Sri Anjanappa S/o Late Kariyappa¶22
respondent
Smt. Kenchamma W/o Late Sannaiah (since dead, represented by her LRs)¶23
respondent
Basavarajappa S/o Late Sannaiah (LR of respondent No.3)¶24
respondent
Hanumanthappa S/o Late Sannaiah (LR of respondent No.3)¶25

Coram

AI extract

Ravi V Hosmaniauthor¶29

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 6 Jan 2026 · January
Registered: 16 Dec 2024
Case no.: RSA/1760/2024
CNR: KAHC010727002024
Bench: Ravi V Hosmani
Disposal: Dismissed for Non-Prosecution
Case type: Regular Second Appeal (RSA)

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Ravi V Hosmani

Sri B S Sadvik Vs Sri B N Suresha
5 Jan 2026
Smt. Parvathamma @ B. T. Paravatghamma Vs the Bangalore Development Authority
19 Dec 2025
V Muthuraju Vs S Kumar Since Deceased Represented by His Legal Representatives
19 Dec 2025
Chikkamma Vs Devegowda
6 Jan 2026
Smt Thimmavva @ Thimmakka Vs the Chief Secretary
6 Jan 2026
Smt Maridevi Vs Karigowda Since Dead by Lrs Smt. Karagamma
6 Jan 2026

Cite this judgement

Smt Shekramma v. Sri Deveerappa, RSA/1760/2024 (KA), decided on 6 January 2026.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Code of Civil ProcedureSection 100

View all statutes

Procedural history3

Judgment and decree dated 12.09.2024 in R.A. No. 6/2024 dismissing the first appeal and confirming the trial court's judgment and decree in O.S. No.153/2015.Senior Civil Judge and Prl. JMFC, Tarikere · 12.09.2024
Suit O.S. No.153/2015 decided by judgment and decree dated 07.02.2024 by the Civil Judge and Additional JMFC, Tarikere.
First appeal R.A. No. 6/2024 before the Senior Civil Judge and Prl. JMFC, Tarikere was dismissed by judgment and decree dated 12.09.2024, confirming the trial court's decree.

View full history

Bench / Coram

Ravi V Hosmani

Parties & counsel