Dismissed¶52

Smt. Putalakshmamma v. M. K. Mahesh Raju

Karnataka HC12 Jun 2026RSA/549/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RSA No. 549 of 2018 (PAR), High Court of Karnataka, decided 12-06-2026, V Srishananda J. — second appeal under S.100 CPC against order dated 12.8.2017 in RA No.46/2015 (II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Mandya) dismissing the appeal against judgment and decree dated 31.1.2012 in OS No.115/2003 (Prl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn), Mandya); dismissed as withdrawn as settled out of Court on appellant's memo, appellants' share stated to be satisfied in FDP No.21/2012; Putalakshmamma v. M.K. Mahesh Raju and others.

What did the court decide?

On the memo for withdrawal filed by learned counsel for the appellant, the Court placed the memo on record and dismissed the Regular Second Appeal as withdrawn, as settled out of Court. ¶52

Smt. Putalakshmamma Vs M. K. Mahesh Raju — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:29383 RSA No. 549 of 2018

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 549 OF 2018 (PAR)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SMT. PUTALAKSHMAMMA W/O. LATE N. KADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, RESIDING AT ARALAHALLI VILLAGE, MYSORE NAGAMANGALA ROAD, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 435.

¶9

…APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SRI. RAJASHEKAR S, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

M. K. MAHESH RAJU S/O. LATE N. KADAIAH, Digitally AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, signed by MALATESH RESIDING AT NO.100, K C ARALAHALLI VILLAGE, Location: MYSORE-NAGAMANGALA ROAD, HIGH PANDAVAPURA TALUK, COURT OF MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 435. KARNATAKA

¶13

SMT. M. K. BHANUMATHI D/O. LATE N. KADAIAH, W/O. VISHWESHWARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.100,

¶14

¶15

NC: 2026:KHC:29383 RSA No. 549 of 2018

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

ARALAHALLI VILLAGE, MYSORE-NAGAMANGALA ROAD, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 435.

¶18

SMT. M. K. RAJESHWARI D/O. LATE N. KADAIAH, W/O. H. RAJESH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.59, ARALAHALLI VILLAGE, MYSORE-NAGAMANGALA ROAD, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT- 571 435.

¶19

SMT. K. THEJASHWINI D/O. LATE N. KADAIAH, W/O. M. K. LOKESH, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.80/11, 6TH STAGE, 5TH CROSS, K.R. LAYOUT, J. P. NAGARA, BANGALORE - 560 078.

¶20

SMT. M. K. DHAKSHYANI D/O. LATE N. KADAIAH, W/O. CHANDRU, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.100, ARALAHALLI VILLAGE, MYSORE-NAGAMANGALA ROAD, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 435.

¶21

¶22

NC: 2026:KHC:29383 RSA No. 549 of 2018

¶23

HC-KAR

¶24

SMT. N. VANAJAKSHAMMA W/O. CHIKKAHOMBAIAH, D/O. LATE K. NINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT NO. 1668, 3RD CROSS, VIDYANAGAR, MANDYA TOWN - 571 401.

¶25

SMT. N. PANKAJAMMA W/O. S. KRISHNAPPA, D/O. LATE K. NINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO. 96/11, 23RD CROSS, K.R. LAYOUT, J. P. NAGAR, 6TH STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 078.

¶26

PRAMEELA KUMAR @ KANYAKUMARI D/O. LATE K. NINGAIAH, W/O. SITARAM, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT SRINIVASAPURA, UMAADAHALLI GATE, MANDYA TOWN - 571 401.

¶27

POULIN D'SOUZA @ PUSHPA W/O. LATE N. SHIVASHANKARA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,

¶28

S. DEEPAK

¶29

S/O. LATE N. SHIVASHANKARA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,

¶30

S. ANWITHA D/O. LATE N. SHIVASHANKARA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,

¶31

¶32

NC: 2026:KHC:29383 RSA No. 549 of 2018

¶33

HC-KAR

¶34

RESPONDENTS NO. 9 TO 11 ARE RESIDING C/O. H. P. SCHOOL, BONTHAGAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, S.R. PATNA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 434.

¶35

N. MALIKARJUNA

¶36

S/O. LATE K. NINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 1668, 3RD CROSS, VIDYANAGAR, MANDYA TOWN - 571 401.

¶37

…RESPONDENTS

¶38

(BY SRI. A. LOURDU MARIYAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R5; SRI. KEMPANNA, ADVOCATE FOR R8; VIDE ORDER DATED 04.07.2024, NOTICE IS HELD SUFFICIENT IN RESPECT OF R9, R10 AND R11; VIDE ORDER DATED 05.06.2026, APPEAL STANDS DISMISSED AS AGAINST R6, R7 AND R12)

¶39

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 12.8.2017 PASSED IN RA NO.46/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANDYA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.1.2012 PASSED IN OS NO.115/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) MANDYA.

¶40

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶41

¶42

NC: 2026:KHC:29383 RSA No. 549 of 2018

¶43

HC-KAR

¶44

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶45

ORAL ORDER

¶46

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo

¶47

for withdrawal. The memo reads as under:

¶48

"Appellant herein submits that the present appeal is filed challenging preliminary decree dated 31.01.2012 passed in O.S.No.115/2003 which is one partition, which got confirmed in RA No.46/2015.

¶49

Notwithstanding pendency of this Regular Second Appeal, plaintiffs initiated Final Decree Proceedings in FDP No.21/2012. In the said Final Decree Proceedings share of appellants is duly indicated and Final Decree is drawn up after hearing the parties. Appellants claim for their share is duly satisfied in the aforesaid Final Decree Proceedings.

¶50

Under these circumstances, the present appeal does not survive for consideration and as such the present appeal may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn in the interest of justice.”

¶51

Placing the memo on record, appeal stands

¶52

dismissed as withdrawn as settled out of Court.

¶53

Sd/(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

¶54

KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 92

Smt. Putalakshmamma v. M. K. Mahesh Raju

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Putalakshmamma v. M. K. Mahesh Raju

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Siddashetty Vs Mahadevashetty

Sri Mahadevashetty Vs Sri Siddashetty

Sri. Muddappa Gowda Vs Sri. Ramachandra Gowda

Chamundi Vs D.S.Ravishankar

Smt. Gowramma Vs Rajanna

Sri Gubbi Huchaiah Vs Sri Siddalingaiah