Dismissed¶57

Chamundi v. D.S.Ravishankar

Regular Second Appeal under S.100 CPC – dismissed for non-prosecution – none appeared for the appellants

Karnataka HC12 Jun 2026RSA/247/2020

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, Justice V Srishananda, decided 12.06.2026; RSA No. 247 of 2020 (POS); Chamundi (since dead by LRs) through Appellants 1-12 v. D.S. Ravishankar; second appeal under Section 100 CPC against first appellate judgment in R.A.No.05/2019 confirming decree in O.S.No.111/2006; dismissed for non-prosecution due to non-appearance of counsel for appellants; no merits adjudication; no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

There was no appearance for appellant No.2 or for appellants No.1 and 3 to 12. ¶55

Chamundi Vs D.S.Ravishankar — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:28664 RSA No. 247 of 2020

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶8

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 247 OF 2020 (POS)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

CHAMUNDI

¶11

SINCE DEAD BY LRS

¶12

CHINNAMMA W/O LATE CHAMUNDI AGED 56 YEARS

¶13

BANNAIAH

¶14

S/O LATE CHAMUNDI AGED 43 YEARS

¶15

RANGASWAMY

¶16

SINCE DEAD BY LRS

¶17

Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶18

PUSHPAVATHI W/O LATE RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶19

RAMYA Digitally signed byJUANITA THEJESWINILocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA D/O LATE RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS

¶20

CHARULATHA

¶21

D/O LATE RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS

¶22

PALLAVI D/O LATE RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 8 YEARS

¶23

¶24

NC: 2026:KHC:28664 RSA No. 247 of 2020

¶25

HC-KAR

¶26

APPELLANTS NO.4 TO 6 ARE MINORS UNDER REP. BY NATURAL GUARDIAN APPELLANT NO.3 PUSHPAVATHI W/O LATE RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

¶27

APPELLANT NO.1 TO 6 ARE R/AT NO.13, D.DEVARAJA COLONY VISHWESHWARANAGARA MYSURU-570008.

¶28

RANGAMMA D/O LATE CHAMUNDI AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

¶29

GANESHA S/O LATE CHAMUNDI AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS

¶30

APPELLANT NO.7 AND 8 ARE R/AT SY.NO.109/2, SRIRAMAPURA 2^ND STAGE, DEVAIAHMAHUNDI VILLAGE MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU-570008.

¶31

MAAGALI SINCE DEAD BY LRS

¶32

BANAMMA W/O LATE MAAGALI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

¶33

SRIDEVI D/O LATE MAAGALI AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

¶34

APPELLANT NO.9 & 10 ARE R/AT NO.27, OPPOSITE SILK FACTORY MANANDAVADI ROAD RAJIVGANDHI COLONY MYSURU-570004.

¶35

¶36

NC: 2026:KHC:28664 RSA No. 247 of 2020

¶37

HC-KAR

¶38

HEMACHANDRA S/O LATE MAAGALI AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

¶39

ARATHI D/O LATE MAAGALI AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶40

APPELLANT NO.11 & 12 R/AT NO.163, DEVAIAHNAHUNDI VILLAGE SRIRAMPURA, 2^ND STAGE MYSURU-570008.

¶41

…APPELLANTS

¶42

(BY SRI. SHARATH S GOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR A2 SRI. SWAMY., ADVOCATE FOR A1 & A3 TO A12)

¶43

AND:

¶44

D.S. RAVISHANKAR S/O D.S. SHIVASHANKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT DEVAIAHANAHUNDI VILLAGE SRIRAMPURA 2^ND STAGE MYSURU-570008.

¶45

NOW AT VENKATARAMASWAMY TEMPLE STREET, MADHUGIRI TUMKUR DISTRICT PIN-572132.

¶46

…RESPONDENT

¶47

(BY SRI. P. NATARAJU., ADVOCATE C/R)

¶48

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.04.2019 PASSED IN R.A.NO.05/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSURU DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.11.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.111/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDGE, ADDL. SMALL CAUSES AND SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, MYSURU AND ETC.

¶49

¶50

NC: 2026:KHC:28664 RSA No. 247 of 2020

¶51

HC-KAR

¶52

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶53

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA

¶54

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶55