Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Smt. Nagaveni, Vs Sri. Ramanachari — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Home
Karnataka HC
2026
Smt. Nagaveni, Vs Sri. RamanachariSmt. Nagaveni, v. Sri. Ramanachari

Dismissed¶¶38

Smt. Nagaveni, v. Sri. Ramanachari

Karnataka HC6 Apr 2026RSA/267/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RSA No. 267 of 2024 (SP); High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru; Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur; decided 06.04.2026; filed under Sec.100 CPC; against judgment and decree dated 01.09.2023 in R.A.No.68/21, Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kolar; first appeal had partly set aside judgment and decree dated 30.08.2021 in OS No.76/2019, Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Mulbagal; appellants Smt. Nagaveni, Bhavana and Naveen Gowda (minors rep. by mother/natural guardian); respondent Sri. Ramanachari; counsel S. Visweswaraiah (appellants) and Shekar L.S. (respondent); withdrawal memo at admission stage; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; no objection by respondent; no issues decided; no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

None; the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn on the memorandum filed by counsel for the appellants, with no objection from counsel for the respondent.

Why is it important?

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn: counsel for the appellants filed a memo seeking withdrawal signed by appellant No.1, who represents the minor appellants Nos. 2 and 3 as natural guardian; the memo was taken on record and counsel for the respondent raised no objection. ¶¶38

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

None; the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn on the memorandum filed by counsel for the appellants, with no objection from counsel for the respondent.

Ratio / Principle

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn: counsel for the appellants filed a memo seeking withdrawal signed by appellant No.1, who represents the minor appellants Nos. 2 and 3 as natural guardian; the memo was taken on record and counsel for the respondent raised no objection.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Regular Second Appeal No. 267 of 2024 (SP), High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru (Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur), oral judgment dated 06.04.2026. Filed under Sec.100 CPC against the judgment and decree dated 01.09.2023 in R.A.No.68/21 on the file of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kolar, whereby the first appeal was allowed and the judgment and decree dated 30.08.2021 in OS No.76/2019 (Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Mulbagal) was partly set aside. At the admission stage itself, counsel for the appellants — Smt. Nagaveni and her minor children Bhavana and Naveen Gowda, represented by their mother as natural guardian — filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal; the memo was taken on record and counsel for the respondent (Sri. Ramanachari) raised no objection. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive issue was framed or decided; no precedent was cited.

A

1 -

NC: 2026:KHC:18386 RSA No. 267 of 2024

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 267 OF 2024 (SP)

BETWEEN:

SMT. NAGAVENI, W/O SHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,

BHAVANA

D/O SHANKAR,

AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS,

NAVEEN GOWDA S/O SHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS, SINCE MINORS, ARE REP BY THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT.NAGAVENI R/AT IRAGAMUTHANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 131

… APPELLANTS

Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

(BY SRI.S.VISWESWARAIAH, ADVOCATE)

AND:

SRI. RAMANACHARI, S/O LATE NARAYANACHARI, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT HOUSE NO. 43 SHRIVATHSA NILAYA, 4^TH CROSS, PALASANDRA LAYOUT, KOLAR CITY - 563 101.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI.SHEKAR L.S., ADVOCATE)

2 -

NC: 2026:KHC:18386 RSA No. 267 of 2024

HC-KAR

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.09.2023. PASSED IN R.A.NO.68/21 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOLAR, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND PARTLY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.08.2021 PASSED IN OS NO.76/2019 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MULBAGAL.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR

ORAL JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellants and learned

counsel for the respondent are present.

Appellant No.1 is present. Appellant Nos.2 and 3

are minors.

Learned counsel for the appellants files a memo

seeking withdrawal of the appeal with the signature of the appellate No.1. Appellant No.1 represents appellant Nos.2 and 3 as a natural guardian.

The memo is taken on record.

Learned counsel for the respondent does not

have any objection.

NC: 2026:KHC:18386 RSA No. 267 of 2024

3 -

HC-KAR

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as

withdrawn .

Sd/(PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE

RCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Code of Civil Procedure100¶¶23

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Judgment and decree dated 01.09.2023 in R.A.No.68/21 allowing the first appeal and partly setting aside the judgment and decree dated 30.08.2021 in OS No.76/2019.¶¶23
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kolar · 01.09.2023
Prior proceeding
Original suit OS No.76/2019 before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Mulbagal, decided by judgment and decree dated 30.08.2021, which was later partly set aside in first appeal.¶¶23
Prior proceeding
First appeal R.A.No.68/21 before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kolar, allowed by judgment and decree dated 01.09.2023, partly setting aside the trial court decree.¶¶23

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
Smt. Nagaveni¶¶8
S. Visweswaraiah
appellant
Bhavana¶¶9
S. Visweswaraiah
appellant
Naveen Gowda¶¶12
S. Visweswaraiah
respondent
Sri. Ramanachari¶¶17
Shekar L.S.

Coram

AI extract

Pradeep Singh Yerurauthor¶¶24

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 6 Apr 2026 · April
Registered: 17 Feb 2024
Case no.: RSA/267/2024
CNR: KAHC010104142024
Bench: Pradeep Singh Yerur
Disposal: DISMISSED
Case type: RSA

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Pradeep Singh Yerur

Mani Vs Raziya Begum
2 Apr 2026
K C Manjula Vs Netravathi
2 Apr 2026
Haleshappa Vs Anasuyamma
2 Apr 2026
Ashoka Vs K B Mahabalesh
6 Apr 2026
Mohammed Shareef Uddin Vs Manjunath N P
6 Apr 2026
Sri Prabhakar Vs Sri Srinivasamurthy R
6 Apr 2026

Cite this judgement

Smt. Nagaveni, v. Sri. Ramanachari, RSA/267/2024 (KA), decided on 6 April 2026.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Code of Civil Procedure100

View all statutes

Procedural history3

Judgment and decree dated 01.09.2023 in R.A.No.68/21 allowing the first appeal and partly setting aside the judgment and decree dated 30.08.2021 in OS No.76/2019.Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kolar · 01.09.2023
Original suit OS No.76/2019 before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Mulbagal, decided by judgment and decree dated 30.08.2021, which was later partly set aside in first appeal.
First appeal R.A.No.68/21 before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Kolar, allowed by judgment and decree dated 01.09.2023, partly setting aside the trial court decree.

View full history

Bench / Coram

Pradeep Singh Yerur

Parties & counsel