Bolarinaika v. Devo Bai
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru (NC: 2026:KHC:22605), RSA No. 2287 of 2007 (MOR), decided 24.04.2026 by E.S. Indiresh, J. Second appeal by defendant Bolarinaika against concurrent decrees in favour of plaintiff Devo Bai (since dead, represented by L.R. Ramachandra Rao Sindhe): trial decree in O.S. No. 32/1995 (Munsiff & JMFC, Hunsur, 26.02.1998) affirmed in R.A. No. 47/1998 (Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Hunsur, 20.06.2007). Appeal not decided on merits; disposed of in terms of compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, compromise stated to be without fraud or coercion. Keywords: compromise, Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC, Section 100 CPC, regular second appeal, disposal in terms of compromise.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed of in terms of the compromise petition filed by the parties under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC; the merits of the second appeal were not decided.