Dismissed¶34

Smt Chikkathayamma v. Sri Ramaiah

Karnataka HC2 Feb 2026RSA/1703/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RSA No.1703 of 2022 (DEC/INJ); High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru; Ravi V Hosmani, J.; order dated 02.02.2026; dismissal for non-prosecution; Section 100 CPC; R.A.No.15/2022; O.S.No.71/2017; IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysuru; IV Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Mysuru; appellants Chikkathayamma, Umesh P, Vasantha, Nagaraju, Nanjunda, Marigowda v. Ramaiah and Javaregowda; office objections; costs; advocate Subhash Chandra Bose absent.

What did the court decide?

The case was passed over and called again, but there was no representation for the appellants. ¶33

Smt Chikkathayamma Vs Sri Ramaiah — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:5881 RSA No. 1703 of 2022

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

¶7

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1703 OF 2022 (DEC/INJ)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SMT CHIKKATHAYAMMA W/O LATE PUTTEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,

¶10

SRI. UMESH P S/O LATE PUTTEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,

¶11

SMT. VASANTHA S/O LATE PUTTEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,

¶12

Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

SRI. NAGARAJU S/O LATE PUTTEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,

¶14

SRI. NANJUNDA S/O LATE PUTTEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,

¶15

SRI. MARIGOWDA S/O LATE PUTTEGOWDA

¶16

ALL ARE RESIDING AT BADAGALAHUNDI VILLAGE, VARAKODU POST, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK.

¶17

…APPELLANTS

¶18

(BY SRI SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:5881 RSA No. 1703 of 2022

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

AND:

¶23

SRI RAMAIAH S/O LATE SIDDRAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, R/AT BADAGALAHUNDI VILLAGE, VARAKONDU POST, VARUNA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK.

¶24

PRESENTLY R/AT NO. 692 4/5^th CROSS, E AND F BLOCK, RAMAKRISHNA NAGARA MYSURU.

¶25

SRI JAVAREGOWDA S/O LATE SIDDARAMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT NO. 590, 1^st 'A CROSS, NEAR MAHAVEERA SCHOOL, LIC COLONY, SRIRAMPURA , 2^nd STAGE, MYSURU

¶26

…RESPONDENTS

¶27

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.08.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO.15/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU. DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.11.2021 PASSED IN O.S.NO.71/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., MYSURU.

¶28

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶29

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:5881 RSA No. 1703 of 2022

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

¶32

ORAL ORDER

¶33

Though, case was passed over and called again, there is no representation. Despite sufficient opportunities, office objections have not been complied, even cost ordered was not paid. This would indicate that appellants are not diligent in pursuing appeal.

¶34

Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶35

Sd/(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE

¶36

Psg* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14

Smt Chikkathayamma v. Sri Ramaiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Chikkathayamma v. Sri Ramaiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri M Veerabhadrappa Vs G Thammanna

Smt. Nanjamma Vs Smt. Jayamma

Pradeep Kumar N Vs Sri Vijay Kumar v

Annayya Puthran Vs the New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Smt Gowramma Vs Sri H M Ramesh

Sri Gurumurthy Vs Smt Gangamma