Dismissed¶¶34

Sri Gurumurthy v. Smt Gangamma

Karnataka HC2 Feb 2026RSA/1653/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC: Second appeal under S.100 CPC against judgment and decree dated 05.10.2010 in RA.No.34/2009 (Senior Civil Judge, Challakere), confirming decree dated 28.02.2009 in OS No.82/2007, dismissed for non-prosecution - no representation when called, office objections not complied with, ordered cost unpaid.

What did the court decide?

Office objections were not complied with and the ordered cost was not paid despite sufficient opportunities, indicating that the appellants were not diligent in pursuing the appeal. ¶¶33

Sri Gurumurthy Vs Smt Gangamma — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:5880 RSA No. 1653 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

¶7

REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1653 OF 2022 (DEC)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI GURUMURTHY S/O RUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

¶10

SRI K R THIPPESWAMY S/O RUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

¶11

SRI ONKARAMMA D/O KERALAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

¶12

Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS' RESIDING AT SANIKERE VILLAGE, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.

¶14

…APPELLANTS

¶15

(BY SRI H K KENCHEGOWDA, ADVOCATE)

¶16

AND:

¶17

SMT. GANGAMMA, W/O CHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,

¶18

R THIPPESWAMY S/O RUDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:5880 RSA No. 1653 of 2022

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

3. SRI PADARAZ S/O BOMMAJJA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

¶23

4. SRI JAYANNA S/O BOMMAJJI AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

¶24

ALL ARE RESIDING AT SANIKERE VILLAGE CHALLAKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.

¶25

…RESPONDENTS

¶26

THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.10.2010 PASSED IN RA.No.34/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CHALLAKERE DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.02.2009 PASSED IN OS No.82/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC, CHALLAKERE.

¶27

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶28

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

¶29

¶30

NC: 2026:KHC:5880 RSA No. 1653 of 2022

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

ORAL ORDER

¶33

Though, case was passed over and called again, there is no representation. Despite sufficient opportunities, office objections have not been complied, even cost ordered was not paid. This would indicate that appellants are not diligent in pursuing appeal.

¶34

Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶35

Sd/(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE

¶36

Psg* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13

Sri Gurumurthy v. Smt Gangamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Gurumurthy v. Smt Gangamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri M Veerabhadrappa Vs G Thammanna

Smt. Nanjamma Vs Smt. Jayamma

Pradeep Kumar N Vs Sri Vijay Kumar v

Annayya Puthran Vs the New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Smt Gowramma Vs Sri H M Ramesh

Smt Chikkathayamma Vs Sri Ramaiah