Sri Arai Gowda v. Sri Kariya Mera
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural dismissal, not a substantive ruling. Keywords: Karnataka High Court; Regular Second Appeal; RSA No. 1657 of 2021; Section 100 of CPC; dismissed for non-prosecution; appellant absent / no representation; counsel absent; admission stage; suo motu listing; RA.No.114/2003; OS No.333/1989; Puttur Taluk, Dakshina Kannada; suit for permanent injunction; trial decree set aside by first appellate court; V Srishananda J; decision dated 24.07.2026. Useful to trace the fate of this second appeal or the chain of decrees in OS No.333/1989; carries no ratio on injunction or property rights.
What did the court decide?
Since there was no representation on behalf of the appellant on the date of hearing (there had been no representation for the appellant even on the last date of hearing) and the appeal is of the year 2021, this Court dismissed the Regular Second Appeal for non-prosecution, having suo motu listed it for admission in the interest of justice.