Dismissed¶36

Sampath Kumar H S v. Shubha @ Mamatha

Karnataka HC21 Apr 2026RPFC/276/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RPFC No. 276 of 2024; High Court of Karnataka; Dr. Justice K. Manmadha Rao; maintenance; S.125 Cr.P.C; S.19(4) Family Courts Act; Crl.Misc.No.91/2023; Principal Judge, Family Court, Chikkamagaluru; dismissal for non-prosecution; counsel retirement memo; no-objection certificate (NOC); vakalath; petitioner absent; respondent Shubha @ Mamatha; petitioner Sampath Kumar H.S.

What did the court decide?

None; petition dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶36

Sampath Kumar H S Vs Shubha @ Mamatha — Maintenance and Alimony | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:21591 RPFC No. 276 of 2024

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO.276 OF 2024

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SAMPATH KUMAR H.S. S/O. SANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT. AMBEDKAR NAGARA, OPPOSITE TO ASHRAMA SCHOOL HOLENARASIPURA TOWN, HASSAN DISTRICT PIN:573 221.

¶10

&PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. SAMPATH KUMAR H.S., - PETITIONER (ABSENT))

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N

¶14

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

SHUBHA @ MAMATHA, W/O. SAMPATH KUMAR H.S., AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT. BASAVANAHALLI EXTENSION, CHIKKAMAGALURU TOWN, PIN:577 101.

¶16

(BY SMT. ANURADHA S.K.,ADVOCATE)

¶17

&RESPONDENT

¶18

THIS RPFC IS FILED U/S.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 04.10.2024 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.NO. 91/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, CHIKKAMAGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.125 OF Cr.P.C FOR MAINTENANCE.

¶19

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶20

¶21

NC: 2026:KHC:21591 RPFC No. 276 of 2024

¶22

HC-KAR

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

Sri.B Vijay Shetty, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner appears through virtual hearing. None appears for the respondent.

¶26

2. Sri.B Vijay Shetty, learned counsel has filed

¶27

memo for retirement and the same reads as follows:

¶28

<The undersigned counsel in the above case most respectfully submitting the petitioner has taken the NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE from me in the Vakalath along with entire file by affixing his signature on the acknowledgement, in the above case on 09-03-2026. The copy of the said acknowledgement is also herewith produced for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble court. Hence my name may kindly be deleted from the position of Advocate for the petitioner in the above case to meet the ends of justice and equity=.

¶29

3. Memo is taken on record. Sri.B Vijay Shetty,

¶30

learned counsel is permitted to retire from this case.

¶31

In view of the memo, it appears that although

¶32

the petitioner has received a No Objection Certificate (NOC) and the vakalatnama from previous counsel, the

¶33

NC: 2026:KHC:21591 RPFC No. 276 of 2024

¶34

¶35

HC-KAR

¶36

petitioner did not choose to engage new counsel. It further appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for

¶37

non-prosecution.

¶38

SD/(DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE

¶39

GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9

Sampath Kumar H S v. Shubha @ Mamatha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sampath Kumar H S v. Shubha @ Mamatha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Chandrakala v B Vs Sri Janardhan R

Smt. Rathna P Vs Sri. Chikkamanchaiah S M

Sri Ramu Alias Driver Ramu Vs Smt Shyamala

Sri Lingesh K S Vs Smt Sudha

Mr Vinod P Shetty Vs Mrs Rashmitha v Shetty

Mr. Vinoot Chennabasappa Ullegaddi Vs Nil