Dismissed¶¶86

Sri. Mahadevappa v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC22 Jun 2026RP/381/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review petition; S.114 read with Order 47 Rule 1 CPC; error apparent on face of record; extent of tenancy land (30 guntas vs claimed 1 acre 30 guntas); Survey No.376, Lalanahalli Village, Kasaba Hobli, Krishnarajanagar Taluk, Mysore/Mysuru; Land Tribunal tenancy grant; W.P. No.35199/2012 (LR); Full Bench precedent Lokayya Poojary v. State of Karnataka, ILR 2012 Karnataka 4345, followed; review petition dismissed.

What did the court decide?

In passing the impugned order dated 07.02.2023 in W.P.No.35199/2012, the Court had taken into consideration the entire material on record and followed the judgment of the Full Bench of this Court in Lokayya Poojary v. State of Karnataka (ILR 2012 Karnataka 4345). ¶¶81

Sri. Mahadevappa Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:30546 RP No. 381 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 22^ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO. 381 OF 2024

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. MAHADEVAPPA, S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT LALANAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, K.R.NAGAR TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 602.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. SUBRAHMANYA P.D., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THE SECRETARY TO Digitally signed by REVENUE DEPARTMENT, CHAYA S A Location: HIGH M.S. BUILDING, COURT OF BANGALORE - 560 001. KARNATAKA

¶14

THE LAND TRIBUNAL, KRISHNARAJANAGAR TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 602, BY ITS CHAIRMAN.

¶15

L.S.SOMASHEKARAIAH, SINCE DEAD BY LRS

¶16

¶17

NC: 2026:KHC:30546 RP No. 381 of 2024

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

3A SMT. NEELAMMA, W/O LATE SOMASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT LALANAHALLI, KASABA HOBLI, K R NAGAR TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 602.

¶20

3B LOKESH, S/O LATE SOMASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HEAD MASTER, LOIN SCHOOL, HUNSUR ROAD, K R NAGAR, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 602.

¶21

3C MANJUNATHA, S/O LATE SOMASHEKARAIAH, SINCE DEAD BY LRS

¶22

3C1 SMT. L.C.REKHA, W/O LATE MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

¶23

3C2 YASAHWANTHA, S/O LATE MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,

¶24

RESPONDENT NOS.3C1 AND 3C2 ARE RESIDING AT LALANAHALLI, WARD NO.15, BASAVESHWARA BLOCK, K R NAGAR - 571 602, MYSURU DISTRICT.

¶25

¶26

NC: 2026:KHC:30546 RP No. 381 of 2024

¶27

HC-KAR

¶28

3D PRABHAVATHI,

¶29

D/O LATE SOMASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, HAGANAHALLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK,

¶30

MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 602.

¶31

3E KOMALA,

¶32

W/O SIDDALINGAPPA,

¶33

D/O LATE SOMASHEKARAIAH MAGENAHALLI, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK,

¶34

HASSAN DISTRICT - 571 602.

¶35

3F RATHNA,

¶36

D/O LATE SOMASHEKARAIAH,

¶37

AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O KATTAIAH, HASSAN TALUK,

¶38

HASSAN DISTRICT - 571 602.

¶39

4 CHANDRASHEKARAIAH ALIAS KALINGAIAH,

¶40

S/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA, SINCE DIED

¶41

REPRESENTED BY LRS

¶42

4A SMT. RAJAMANI, W/O LATE CHANDRASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,

¶43

4B NANDISH,

¶44

S/O LATE CHANDRASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

¶45

¶46

NC: 2026:KHC:30546 RP No. 381 of 2024

¶47

HC-KAR

¶48

4C SATHISH,

¶49

S/O LATE CHANDRASHEKARAIAH,

¶50

AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,

¶51

4D MANJULA,

¶52

D/O LATE CHANDRASHEKARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,

¶53

4E SARVAMANGALA,

¶54

D/O LATE CHANDRASHEKARAIAH,

¶55

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,

¶56

4F VASANTH,

¶57

D/O LATE CHANDRASHEKARAIAH,

¶58

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,

¶59

RESPONDENT NOS.4A TO 4F ALL ARE R/AT DODDA LALANAHALLI VILLAGE, BASAVARAJA POST,

¶60

K R NAGAR TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 602.

¶61

5 SUNDARAMANI,

¶62

D/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA, R/AT LALANAHALLI VILLAGE, K R NAGAR TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 602.

¶63

…RESPONDENTS

¶64

(BY SMT.B.P.RADHA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI.NATARAJ BALLAL, ADVOCATE FOR R3(A & B), R3 (1 & 2), R3D, R3E & R3(F);

¶65

NOTICE TO R4(A-F) DISPENSED WITH)

¶66

THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SEC.114 ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF THE CPC PRAYING TO I) CALL FOR RECORDS IN W.P. NO.35199/2012 (LR) ON THE FILE OF THIS HONBLE

¶67

¶68

NC: 2026:KHC:30546 RP No. 381 of 2024

¶69

HC-KAR

¶70

COURT; II) REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 07.02.2023 MADE IN W.P.NO.35199/2012 (LR) (ANNEXURE -A) PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN SO FAR AS IT PERTAINS TO THE DIRECTION TO THE LAND TRIBUNAL TO GRANT TENANCY IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF LAND ADMEASURING 30 GUNTAS IN SY.NO.376 OF LALANHALLI VILLAGE, KASAB HOBLI, KRISHNARAJANAGR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT, AND ISSUE DIRECTION TO THE LAND TRIBUNAL, KRISHNARAJANAGAR TALUK, THE RESPONDENT NO.2 HEREIN, TO GRANT TENANCY IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF LAND ADMEASURING 1 ACRE 30 GUNTAS IN SY.NO.376 OF LALANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASAB HOBLI, KRISHNARAJANAGAR TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶71

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶72

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶73

ORAL ORDER

¶74

In this petition, the petitioner has sought for reviewing the order dated 07.02.2023 in WP No.35199/2012 (Annexure-A).

¶75

It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the total extent of land in Survey No.376 of Lalanahalli Village, Krishnarajanagar Taluk, Mysore, is measuring 3 acres 22 guntas, out of which, the

¶76

father of the petitioner was cultivating the land to an extent of 1 acre 30 guntas. Learned counsel appearing for

¶77

¶78

NC: 2026:KHC:30546 RP No. 381 of 2024

¶79

HC-KAR

¶80

the petitioners further submitted that there is an error apparent on the face of the record as to the extent of land considered by this Court, in the order dated 07.02.2023 in W.P.No.35199/2012 (Annexure-A).

¶81

However, taking into consideration the fact that this Court has considered the entire material on record and followed the judgment of the full Bench of this Court in the

¶82

case of Lokayya Poojary Vs. State of Karnataka reported in ILR 2012 Karnataka 4345 has passed the impugned order at Annexure-A.

¶83