Sri.M.Ramesh Babu v. Miss.Dharani R.Babu
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court at Bengaluru, RP No.321 of 2025, decided 03.07.2026 by Justice Ravi V Hosmani. Review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 CPC against final order dated 14.06.2024 in RPFC No.100/2020; IA No.1/2025 seeking condonation of 382 days' delay dismissed on the ground that party's ailments do not excuse counsel's absence and that a review on the ground of counsel's absence after a merits decision is 'too spacious'; review petition consequently dismissed.
What did the court decide?
The ailments suffered by the review petitioner would not justify the absence of his counsel; where the matter was heard and decided on merits, an application for review on the ground that counsel was absent and opportunity to the party was denied is 'too spacious'. ¶32