Dismissed¶¶31

M/S Calcue Info Services Pvt. Ltd. v. State Ofkarnataka

Karnataka HC2 Jul 2026WP/5573/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WP 5573/2022 (GM-RES), Karnataka HC Bengaluru, Ravi V Hosmani J., 02.07.2026. Petition under Arts. 226 & 227 Constitution to quash FIR No.9/2019 dtd 28.06.2019 (CEN Belagavi Police; transferred to AHTU CID Bangalore; pending JMFC-III Belagavi). Counsel for R2 (JK Sofetech) cited settlement disposal 15.03.2022, restoration allowed 26.03.2024, dues over Rs.19,00,000/- unpaid. Petitioners absent, office objections unmet — dismissed for non-prosecution. Keywords: quashing FIR, Articles 226 227, AHTU CID, JMFC Belagavi, non-prosecution dismissal.

What did the court decide?

Non-appearance of petitioners and failure to comply with office objections on the main matter despite grant of time indicate that the petitioners are not pursuing the matter diligently. ¶¶31

M/S Calcue Info Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:32892 WP No. 5573 of 2022

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF JULY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO. 5573 OF 2022 (GM-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

M/S CALCUE INFO SERVICES PVT LTD HAVING ITS OFFICE AT #5/1, 3B, RICH HOMES, RICHMOND ROAD, BENGALURU, REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR.

¶10

C ANUP KIRAN, DIRECTOR, M/S CALCUE INFO SERVICES PVT LTD. NO 292, 11^TH A CROSS, 14^TH MAIN, J P NAGAR, 2^ND PHASE, BANGALORE CITY, KARNATAKA

¶11

…PETITIONERS

¶12

(BY SMT.. ANJANA C H.,ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶15

STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH THE A H T U C I D, CARLTON HOUSE, BENGALURU CARLTON HOUSE, PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560001.

¶16

M/S J K SOFETECHPVT LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO 10632, 3^RD FLOOR, MUJAWAR ARCADE, P B ROAD, NEHRU NAGAR, BELGAUM 590010, REPRESENTED BY AUTHORISED SIGNATORY.

¶17

…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.SOWMYA R, HCGP FOR R1,

¶18

SRI. MANIKANTHA J.,ADVOCATE FOR SMT.POONAM S PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶19

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:32892 WP No. 5573 of 2022

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE JMFC III COURT, BELAGAVI IN FIR NO.9 OF 2019 DTD 28.06.2019 VIDE ANNX-B (EARLIER REGISTERED BY THE C.E.N. BELAGAVI POLICE) PRESENTLY BEING INVESTIGATED BY R-1 A.H.T.U. CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT POLICE, BANGALORE AS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS.

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

Seeking for quashing of proceedings in FIR No.9/2019 registered by Belagavi City CEN Crime Police Station, which is pending before Court of JMFC-III, Belagavi, and are stated to have been transferred to AHTU, Crime Investigation Department, Bengaluru, this petition is filed.

¶26

2. Sri Manikantha J, learned counsel appearing for

¶27

respondent no.2 submitted that during pendency of matter, proceedings were disposed of on 15.03.2022 as settled. However, due to non-compliance with terms of settlement, an application for recalling and restoration of

¶28

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:32892 WP No. 5573 of 2022

¶29

HC-KAR

¶30

order dated 15.03.2022 was filed. Same was allowed on 26.03.2024. It was submitted that petitioners were due a sum of more than Rs.19,00,000/-, which remained unpaid despite lapse of sufficient period of time. Counsel for respondent no.2 therefore submits that there would be no justification for adjourning matter and seeks for dismissal.

¶31

None appears for petitioners and despite grant of time, office objections on main matter are not complied. This would indicate that petitioners are not pursuing matter diligently. Hence, petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.

¶32

Sd/(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE

¶33

BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6

M/S Calcue Info Services Pvt. Ltd. v. State Ofkarnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Calcue Info Services Pvt. Ltd. v. State Ofkarnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Niranjan Kumar C Vs State of Karnataka

Ninganna Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Sanjay C Paul Vs Smt Sunitha M

Mr Nazim Noor Mohammed Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. Ravikumar Vs the State-through the

B S Sharada Vs State of Karnataka