Smt Premamma v. Sri G Dayalu
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petition dismissed as infructuous; RP No. 306 of 2024, High Court of Karnataka (HC-KAR), NC: 2026:KHC:33930; review under S.114 CPC r/w Order 47 Rule 1 CPC of judgment and order dated 20/06/2024 in M.F.A. No. 1928/2024. Petitioners: Smt. Premamma, Smt. Renuka, Smt. Vijayalakshmi, Smt. Lakshmi C, Sri. Lakshman Murthy, Sri. Prabhakar S.C, Sri. Premkumar, Sri. S.R. Munichowdappa, Sri. S.R. Muniyappa, Smt. Parvathamma, Smt. Gayathi, Sri. Srikantha S.V. Respondents: Sri. G. Dayalu, Sri. Mukesh M. Counsel: Rahul S. Reddy (petitioners); Sanjay H Sethiya (R1 and R2). Judge: Ravi V Hosmani. Keywords: memo of counsel, infructuous, review petition, CPC S.114 / O.47 R.1, 06-07-2026.
What did the court decide?
None; the Memo filed by learned counsel for petitioners stating the petition had become infructuous was taken on record and the review petition was dismissed as infructuous.